Living the values of Freedom Day

2013-04-23 00:00

THIS weekend will be the 19th anniversary of our first democratic elections as a free South Africa. In the run-up to April 27, we have torn our nation further and further apart with divisive dialogue about transformation versus merit, white male judges versus black male judges and employment equity. But this dialogue is a necessary reminder that we should use Freedom Day to reflect, individually and collectively, on fears, prejudices, and objective conditions that divide us.

The racially divided public discourse reflects the reality of our failure to fashion a post-racial society. Studies show frequently that the objective condition of our society still reflects the divided past, although there are emerging signs of a united post-apartheid future. In our public discourse, we blame the “other” side for our problems and seldom own up to our own failures. We grandstand a lot. We easily blame apartheid or transformation. We blame the whiteness system or black government for all the failures that are actually ours collectively.

Too quickly we forget that whatever exists of a new South Africa is the result of many who sacrificed their own dreams fighting for a better country, from the Khoisan in the 17th century to anti-apartheid movements of the 20th century.

The negotiated settlement was a compromise between apartheid-linked forces and anti-apartheid movements. The compromise Constitution was a bold attempt to envision a post-apartheid, although it can be used to prevent post-apartheid. A painstaking process of reconciliation, nation-building and development began in the nineties and is far from finished, for this must take a generation, at least, to accomplish. Approaching 20 years means we still have another 20 to 30 years to continue working at building a new nation to the level where we do not need transitional measures like affirmative action, empowerment, land reform, transformation, national cohesion, and transitional justice.

Changing the entrenched cultural attitudes that divide us is a complex process. Albert Einstein once joked that it is much harder to crack prejudice than an

atom. In the current generation, we may succeed in correcting structural distortions if we work systematically at undoing them, but mind-sets may need the generation contaminated with apartheid and its pains to alter.

It is very likely that our public discourse and politics will cease to be polarised along racial lines or along the notion of defending or attacking privilege accrued as a result of the colonial and apartheid past.

This process of change has to be an organic one incentivised through open dialogues and building on small successes such as our esteemed global status. We have to provide more spaces for young people born after 1994, who are incorrectly called born-frees, when in effect they are born in transition and are not yet free from prejudice, historical advantages or disadvantage, structural poverty and inequality.

Comprehensive education that includes theories of emancipation should play a crucial role. It is not enough only to produce the skills our economy needs to undo the socioeconomic inequalities, it is also necessary to produce new mind-sets, attitudes and the cultural pluralism needed for the building of a new post-apartheid society. To do so, both public and private education will have to strengthen the teaching of social studies, as we have done with maths and science. Teachers should see themselves as dedicated change agents rather than wage-earners. The government has to take radical steps to improve the quality of education, including its relevance in Africa, the quality of leadership from top to bottom, facilities, and the standard of service provision.

Media and public figures should model this post-racial and post-prejudice society we desire. We should have more acrimonious debate for it is cathartic. But it must cease to be the dialogue of the deaf; instead, all sides must debate without self-righteousness. We should learn to say sorry and forgive.

We should show our commitment to post-apartheid by being involved in programmes designed to change society, from crime-combating campaigns to school renovations, from social activism to volunteerism, and from mentoring great leaders of tomorrow to philanthropy. Otherwise, our complaints and criticism are sheer hypocrisy and meaningless self-righteousness. Let us use April 27 to show whomever we criticise how to be efficient and effective in changing society for the better.

• Siphamandla Zondi is the executive director of the Institute for Global Dialogue.

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.