‘Royal sacking complex’

2015-02-11 00:00

TO get suspended indefinitely from the Zulu Royal Household on full pay, all you need to do is get on the wrong side of a royal.

The KZN Legislature heard yesterday that royal decree suspensions are so rife that the Royal Household Department, which manages the affairs of the Zulu royal family, is considering holding a “workshop [for the] royal family on labour laws”.

In one case, a former employee spent 1 238 days on suspension because they were instructed to “leave their place of work” by a royal.

Household officials came in for a thrashing by the KZN Legislature’s public accounts committee (Scopa) on a range of issues, with ANC committee member Sboniso Duma stating that the ­department was in “ICU”.

But the department, which by April will fall under the Office of the Premier and be known as the Royal Household Trust, said there is little they can do.

CFO Mduduzi Mthembu said: “The employees were not suspended by the ­department but … were instructed to leave their place of work by the royal family.”

The department said it could not find them alternative work until they “exited their employment”. The man who clocked up over 1 200 days eventually reached ­retirement age. Another royal-suspended employee, the committee was told, died.

The premier’s director-general, Nhlanhla Ngidi, said there are ­“complexities in the Royal Household”.

“Staff members on extended leave have been chased away either by one of the queens or even the king himself without consulting the department. The staff ­relationship between them and the queens or king is regulated outside of the Labour Relations [Act]. So if a queen wakes up one day and feels that she no longer needs the services of a particular person, the queen will not refer the matter to the CFO or myself,” said Ngidi.

He said he has “personally experienced this” and raised the issue with the queens.

“When there is no staff in the palaces then they [the royals] complain to me. When I investigate I am now confronted with these factors. If I refer it to the Labour Relations Act, well then that’s another ­story.”

Ngidi said the Royal Household Department is not to blame. “It is not as if the department allowed a staff member to go on a paid holiday with taxpayers’ money. This comes as result of the complex situation to do with the royal household.”

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.