Social grants a badge of poverty

2014-06-24 00:00

THE strike on South Africa’s platinum belt has correctly been categorised as a national crisis, but it is only one aspect of a much more severe crisis that confronts the country. This was highlighted last Tuesday by President Jacob Zuma in his State of the Nation (Sona) address in which he stressed the economy.

The economy is, indeed, in dire straits. But then, so too is the global economy, which politicians have consistently assured us is about to turn yet another corner. But every corner that may have been turned since 2008 merely leads to further crises. At least this year’s Sona seems to have acknowledged this.

At the same time, however, corporate profits have continued to increase, while more small businesses have gone to the wall, as increasing numbers of men and women around the world have found themselves without work and no prospect of getting any. And, in the unemployment league, we are among the world leaders.

But, the government continues to trumpet: there are many more South Africans today who receive government handouts in the form of social grants. This is true. But such grants are, in fact, a badge of poverty. Take the pension, for example. Between the ages of 60 and 70, an impecunious individual qualifies for R1 350 a month. Beyond 70, this increases to R1 370; hardly an above-poverty income, even if it does not have to be shared. And most social grants are shared, sometimes by up to 10 dependants. Many of these dependants will be part of the growing ranks of unemployed youth, often raised and still cared for by grandmothers. However, the ranks of the poor do not comprise only the unemployed and grant beneficiaries. There are still legions of the working poor.

According to most labour-movement estimates, a wage of between R3 000 and R4 000 a month is the bare minimum “living wage”. But, according to the same estimates, more than half the men and women in South Africa fortunate to have a job are still paid less than this. In some cases, substantially less.

Take domestic workers, for example. In most urban areas, the monthly minimum, determined by government, is R1 877,70. Most such urban workers also live a considerable distance away from their jobs and transport costs are estimated to average R400 a month. Domestic workers in the rural areas usually do not have the same transport costs, so their minimum monthly wage of R1 618,37 probably makes them marginally better off. However, food and other retail costs in such areas can be higher.

Farm workers are another group among the lowest paid. Their government-determined minimum pay rate soared last year after a series of sometimes violent protests in the Western Cape. Five years ago, monthly pay for a farm worker was R1 231,70. Today, it is R2 274,82, having almost doubled in the wake of the protests.

There are other categories of low-paid workers, such as in the forestry sector and a host of various contract services. What all have in common are the basic needs: food, clothing and shelter, of which food requires the greatest share of income. Most lower-paid employees spend up to 50% of their income on basic foodstuff. I have monitored the prices of a “basket” of basic groceries since 2007. By 2009, the goods in the basket cost R118,14. Last week, the same quantity cost R195,19, a 65% increase. So unless the wages of lower-paid workers increased by more than this, they are worse off today.

But there have been price increases across the board, not least in terms of fuel, and this has a knock-on effect on all forms of transport and the costs of delivery. The official statistician also notes that food prices are outstripping the rate of inflation (CPI), the measure commonly used to assess pay rises.

More highly paid employees may, therefore, also be feeling the pinch. This seems borne out by the retail sales statistics released recently. They show a substantial decline in purchases. At the same time, South Africa already has a frightening level of household debt.

Such economic and social realities make up what Cosatu general secretary Zwelinzima Vavi calls a “ticking time bomb”. And the plans and promises of the Sona do not seem likely to defuse this. Perhaps a “peoples’ assembly”, proposed by the National Union of Metalworkers — it may incorporate a form of “economic Codesa” — would provide some solutions. But some had better be found — and soon.

• Terry Bell is a journalist, commentator and author specialising in political and economic analysis, and labour matters.

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.