Team selection

2009-01-30 00:00

GOVERNMENTS have a legitimate interest in the administration of national sport. The belief that sport and politics have no connection is misleading when many people make lucrative careers from matches played against a backdrop of patriotic, flag-waving fervour. But all reasonable South Africans will applaud reports that planned regulations giving the minister of sport effective power over team selection have been shelved.

In the eighties, current Minister of Sport and Recreation, Makhenkesi Stofile, a talented player from the home of black rugby in the Eastern Cape, occupied an important and honourable role in campaigning against apartheid in sport. In those days there was one quota and it was absolute: only whites were selected for South Africa. Stofile visited New Zealand to support the boycott against rugby tours, a brave move at a time when the government of a police state called its opponents sports terrorists.

It is thus hard to understand why Stofile would want to exercise the power to interfere and select on the basis of ethnicity when most South African teams are now effectively transformed. Was it a case of victim turned victimiser? Or part of an Africanist agenda that simmered beneath the surface of Thabo Mbeki’s administration? In the absence of any evidence that transformation was being obstructed, the proposed measure was a betrayal of those who struggled for nonracial sport. And the Olympic Charter expressly forbids government interference and discrimination of any kind.

There are broader lessons in this episode. The idea that professionals should, by and large, be left to get on with running what they know best should apply in all areas of South African life. Catastrophic failure of the health and education systems can be traced to undue political interference in specialised matters.

However, since international readmission in the early nineties, unwarranted complacency has often affected the sports establishment, leading to many controversies and crises. One continuing omission is a lack of respect for the history of black sport under segregation and apartheid. Most sports commentators and writers seldom refer to it. And as long as sport remains a symbol of nationalism, it will remain on the political agenda.

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.