The pariahs of Asia and their nukes

2009-05-08 00:00

IT is generally agreed that North Korea and Burma have the two most oppressive regimes in Asia. They rule over two of the poorest countries on the continent and that is no coincidence whatever. But there is one marked difference between them. No foreign leaders pay court to the Burmese generals in their weirdly grandiose new capital of Naypidaw (which makes even Brasilia seem cosy and intimate), whereas even Bill Clinton, the world’s most recognisable celebrity statesman, makes the pilgrimage to Pyong-yang.

Clinton was there to secure the release of two American journalists who were seized on the Chinese-North Korean border four months ago, probably­ with the explicit purpose of taking American hostages­ and forcing a high-level United States visit to the North Korean capital. That’s why it was private citizen Bill, rather than his wife, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who made the visit to Kim Jong-il: the U.S. paid the devil his due, but deniably­.

The big difference is this: the Burmese regime is seen by most foreign governments as ugly but basically harmless (except to the Burmese people), whereas the North Korean regime is seen as ugly and extremely dangerous. And the most dangerous thing about North Korea is its nuclear weapons. So if the Burmese generals also want to have emissaries from the great powers genuflecting at their doorstep, they need some nuclear weapons too.

The notion of a nuclear-armed Burma is faintly ridiculous, because the country has no foreign enemies that it needs to deter, let alone wants to attack. But respect matters too, especially regimes (such as the Burmese) that feel their legitimacy is always under question. Burmese nukes would elicit a whole lot of respect.

Articles published in the past week in the Sydney Morning Herald and the Bangkok Post by Professor Desmond Ball of the Australian National University and by Thai-based Irish journalist Phil Thornton suggest that the Burmese military regime has sought North Korean help to build its own nuclear weapons. Specifically, it wants the North Koreans to create a plutonium- reprocessing plant in caves near Naung Laing in northern Burma, not far from the site of a civilian nuclear reactor that is being built with Russian help.

So far, it sounds like the plot for a sequel to “Team America: World Police

,” but the usually reliable website Dictator Watch has been publishing warnings about the Burmese nuclear weapons project for several years now.

Most of the information comes from defectors, including a former army officer who was sent to Moscow for two years’ training in nuclear engineering. One thousand others were being sent as well, he said.

Why would North Korea be doing this? Because it is being paid in “yellowcake” (partially refined uranium­), which Burma processes at the Thabeik Kyin plant. And because of the fact that North Korea is a reckless nuclear­ weapons proliferator that is willing to sell to anybody, makes it more dangerous, and being dangerous is what forces people like Bill and Hillary (and ultimately Barack Obama) to talk to it. All assuming that North Korea really is helping Burma to develop nuclear weapons, of course.

Ball and Thornton suggest that Burma could be processing eight kilograms of plutonium-239 a year by 2014, after which it could produce one atomic bomb per year. Well, yes, but we all know that apparently competent intelligence agencies such as the CIA and Mossad have been predicting that Iran will have nuclear weapons within five years, practically every year since the early nineties. They were wrong about Iran every year and Iran is a much more serious country, in scientific, technological and industrial terms, than Burma.

But suppose this is true. Why would Burma be doing it? Not to nuke Thailand or Malaysia or Bangladesh, surely, for it has no serious quarrel with its neighbours. But one can imagine that Senior General Than Shwe and his colleagues would feel a good deal more secure if the U.S. and other great powers, instead of condemning and boycotting the Burmese dictatorship, were begging it to be responsible and give up its nuclear weapons.

Could it be as simple as this? Of course it could. That’s why North Korea developed nuclear weapons, too.

• Gwynne Dyer is a London-based independent journalist whose articles are published in 45 countries.

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.