Thuli’s praise for Nkandla action

2014-08-13 00:00

PUBLIC Protector Thuli Madonsela has praised the Special Investigating Unit for its legal pursuit of Nkandla architect Minenhle Makhanya.

“The SIU has done a good job,” she said in a statement issued by her office.

Madonsela welcomed further criminal charges.

“We welcome criminal action in all cases where there was corruption or malfeasance,” she said.

The elusive architect was a focal point of her 400-page investigation report on the president’s homestead, titled S ecure in Comfort .

Her findings identified Makhanya as a leading cause of soaring costs and misuse of government funds linked to the project.

They mirror the content of court papers filed on Monday by the Special Investigations Unit.

Madonsela wrote: “It would appear that the course of events changed significantly around August 2009, when Mr Makhanya, the president’s private architect who had been involved in the president’s non-security construction works, was brought in, without going on tender, to act as the Department of Public Work’s Principal Agent in respect of the entire Nkandla Project, while retaining his position as the president’s principal agent and architect.

“This is the period when the scale of work increased exponentially, leading to installations that were not recommended in any of the authorising instruments or Security Evaluation Reports and the cost of works escalating to over R215 million. ”

In various stages of her report, she highlighted that Makhanya was not qualified to make key security decisions.

“... Furthermore Mr Makhanya is an ordinary architect and not a security expert or adviser,” she said.

“I have had great difficulty understanding why Mr Makhanya and the other consultants and contractors brought in on account of prior involvement in President Zuma’s private renovations, were considered key to the work relating to the helipads, the clinic, homes for police members, the relocation of households and most of the general site works.

“Most of these measures were unrelated to the private renovations by the president and were executed outside his private property.”

She wrote that Makhanya was repeatedly asked to be frugal with his spending.

“What is particularly disturbing is that the minutes show that Mr Makhanya was often asked to design something more economic and he would come back with something more expensive or even luxurious and then make a submission regarding why the ‘security’ needs had to be met through the more costly design,” Madonsela said.

“His ticket to the project was on account of non-security related architectural work he was performing for his client, the president.”

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.