Top democracies threaten media

2014-06-25 00:00

SIGNIFICANT threats to media freedom are coming from unexpected places, the World Editors’ Forum heard in Turin, Italy, last week. Some of the model open societies — those that press the rest of the world to choose this path to democracy, such as the United States and the United Kingdom, have been tightening up since the events of 9/11.

“When the Guardian is forced to destroy computer hard drives and the editor is subjected to a political grilling over a story, arguably the most important global public-interest story in a decade, when people who should be receiving medals are being put on trial by their governments ... it is a trend that should be unsettling for all of us,” said Aidan White, a long-time media-freedom campaigner and a director of the Ethical Journalism Network.

He was referring to the UK authorities forcing the Guardian to destroy hard drives with the material leaked by former U.S. security consultant Edward Snowden, the appearance of Guardian editor-in-chief Alan Rusbridger before a hostile parliamentary committee to account for running Snowden’s revelations, and the U.S.’s ardent pursuit of whistle-blowers who expose wrongdoing.


A recent report by former Washington Post executive editor Leonard Downie accused U.S. President Barack Obama — who came to power promising greater transparency — of running one of the most closed and threatening U.S. administrations for many years. The aggressive prosecution of leakers of information deters government sources from speaking to journalists, even when it is in the public interest, he argued.

Six U.S. government employees have been prosecuted under the 1917 Espionage Act, accused of leaking information to the press, compared to three such prosecutions in all previous U.S. administrations. Reporters’ phone logs and e-mails have been seized secretly in two investigations, exposing all their contacts.

“This is the most closed, control-freak administration I’ve covered,” Downie quoted veteran Washington correspondent David Sanger of the New York Times as saying.

To keep this in perspective, the Golden Pen of Freedom this year went to Ethiopian Eskinder Nega, who, after losing his licence to practise journalism, continued to write about the conditions under which many of his fellow writers were being held in prison. He was given the opportunity to get first-hand experience of these conditions for the next 17 years, his seventh stint behind bars.


But what is happening in the U.S. and UK is part of a global battle for control of information, both public and private. The power of governments to watch people and intrude in their lives is much greater than ever, but their ability to hide this and other dangerous activity is weaker. In SA, we know the authorities are using more electronic surveillance than even their apartheid security police predecessors, partly because digitalisation has made this possible. Just last week, the president’s trusted security minister was moved to head telecommunications. What is his interest in that area, one might ask?

The Turin meeting also highlighted a global trend familiar to South Africans: the use of “soft power” by governments to threaten independent media. They cited 30 countries, including this one, where governments are using or threatening to use their advertising clout and biased subsidisation of media to undermine press freedom.


This soft censorship was less noticed, but is “pervasive, not yet recognised for its grave and growing threat to media independence and freedom”, said World Association of Newspapers secretary-general Larry Kilman. It recommended greater transparency and impartiality in all government payments to and funding of media, be it for advertising, content or straightforward subsidies.

In SA, favouring friendly newspapers with advertising and sponsorship from government entities, and withholding it from critical publications, is clearly against public-finance laws. But this does not stop government ministers, such as Blade Nzimande now and Essop Pahad before him, threatening to do it.

— Bizcommunity.

• Anton Harber is a Wits University Caxton Professor of Journalism and chair of the Freedom of Expression Institute.

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.