Unbanned film to hit cinemas

2013-07-29 00:00

WHAT was all the fuss about? That was the feeling of many audience members at the first screening in Durban yesterday of the controversial movie Of Good Report, after it was unbanned on Saturday.

The appeal committee of the Film and Publication Board (FPB) overturned the ruling that the film by South African filmmaker Jamil X.T. Qubeka contains “child pornography”, and it is now rated 16SNVL.

The film’s producer, Michael Auret, launched the appeal, which was heard in Midrand on Saturday. The film can be viewed from this week as it goes on general commercial release on Friday.

Qubeka was in high spirits yesterday as he addressed the audience after the screening at the Durban International Film Festival (Diff), saying “the reason to make a film is for it to be seen”, and he was happy his work could now be enjoyed.

Earlier he called on the FPB’s acting chief operating officer, Sipho Risiba, and spokesperson, Prince Ndamase, to resign, tweeting, “You brothers are not fit for office”.

FPB CEO Yoliswa Makhasi made a statement at the weekend, defending the FPB after the ruling. She said although the board had lost the appeal, they were right to refuse to classify the film.

“We are very disappointed and saddened that the refused classification of the film Of Good Report has been set aside. We shall, however, await the reasons, study them and decide on a way forward.”

On Saturday, Steven Budlender, appearing for Of Good Report’s lawyers, argued that the film is not child pornography as defined by the Constitutional Court, which says it must be intended to stimulate sexual arousal in the target audience. He questioned whether it is intended to stimulate aesthetic or erotic feelings.

The scene in question involves sex between a sugar-daddy teacher and a 16-year-old pupil, Nolitha, played by an older actress. It does not feature nudity.

Diff manager Peter Machen said after the screening that the board did not understand the rights of ordinary South Africans in a democratic South Africa, nor did they see as important the rights of viewers to choose what they could view.

The feeling from the audience was that this year’s Diff was badly organised, with some saying that the banning fiasco could have been avoided had the films been sent to the FPB earlier in the year.

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.