When everyone does their own thing

2007-12-01 00:00

I consider myself rather progressive in my political and social views. (Look to wind and waves for electrical power? Seems like a good idea to me!) But when it comes to the English language, I may very well be a fogey.

Recently, on National Dictionary Day, there was a report on the evening news about revisions being made by the Oxford University Press (OUP) to its American Oxford Dictionaries. In short, the spelling of many terms and expressions, long deemed incorrect, would now be listed as acceptable forms simply because a lot of people use them.

One example is “vocal cord”. As a biology teacher, I’ve written this on the board so many times that I consider myself an expert on its spelling. However, the OUP tells us that many, many people write “chord”. Therefore, “chord” has now been given the status of a bona fide spelling.

Another instance is “to rein in”. I am not a horseman, but I’ve always understood that this refers to a rider’s pulling back on the reins to either slow his steed or get it to stop. However, many people, it seems, like to write “reign”. And so — poof! — this is now acceptable.

Other examples reported on the show were “shoo-in” (as in, “The candidate was a shoo-in for re-election”) as opposed to the (until now) incorrect “shoe-in” (conjuring the image, I suppose, of a travelling salesman putting his foot in the door to prevent the resident from closing it and sending him on his way).

And then there was “bated breath.” Now, in this instance I admit that I often forget whether the word is spelled “bated” or “baited”. So I do what any dinosaur would do. I open the dictionary and check. (Yes, it’s “bated”.) But that’s just old fuddy-duddy me. OUP once again reports that many people write “baited”, and so this has now been granted the status of acceptable usage.

My great fear is that my students will learn of this new, official, laissez faire approach to language (not that they need formal sanction for their poor orthography) and will use it to defend the errors of their ways. Although I teach biology, I spend a good deal of my time correcting students’ grammar and spelling. Just recently, I corrected 40 tests. Thirty-seven of my students wrote “protien” instead of “protein,” because, I suppose, they never learnt the correct spelling and certainly didn’t carefully read the notes I had given them in class.

What they don’t know — yet — is that Oxford University Press now tells them not to trouble themselves with traditionally correct spelling, but rather to enjoy life and, in words the Burger King Corporation would appreciate, “have it your way”.

As a teacher, I am not in the business of giving comfort to enemies of the English language. To be perfectly blunt, I believe the job of the teacher is to dictate good taste.

The problem revisionist thinking generates is this: when one masters a correct expression, including its spelling, it represents an investment in the language, a visible sign that one has actually tried to learn something. Further, knowing the correct form enables one to trace it back to its origins (“bated” means “to hold back”). Result: enlightenment. But if one reads or writes “baited”, the image is of a worm dangling from one’s tongue. Result: confusion.

I have found surprisingly few allies to support my indignation. Even local librarians, to whom I usually appeal with my language laments, seem to feel that going up against Oxford University Press, a Masada of English language authority, is a lost cause. Perhaps. But somewhere deep in my heart, I am hoping for a counter-revolution in some future age of linguistic attentiveness, when the English language will once again be regarded as a thing of wonder, rather than the stuff that happens to dribble out when people open their mouths or put their pens to paper.

Well, I won’t wait with bated breath for that day, but neither will I rein in my standards.

There. I had the last word, after all.

— The Christian Science Monitor

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.