When whites rebelled against the state

2012-03-08 00:00

THE South African National Defence Force (SANDF) was periodically and controversially deployed throughout the internal South African conflicts of the 20th century and virtually permanently during the political turmoil from the mid-eighties until the 1994 election. But during this country’s 20th-century history no single internal military operation matches the ferocity of events on the Witwatersrand (now Gauteng) 90 years ago this week: the 1922 Rand Revolution or Miners’ Strike or Rand Uprising — term usage is dependent upon which reference you consult.

During March 1922, Prime Minister Jan Smuts employed the SANDF’s forerunner, the Union Defence Force (UDF), utilising martial law. Yet, as violent as the 1922 affair was, in the average South African’s historical consciousness it is a long-forgotten event. But 1922 had important consequences. The strikers’ defeat reinforced statutory job reservation based upon race, while the state’s victory ensured that Smuts’s South African Party (SAP) lost the 1924 general election to a “Pact Government” comprising Afrikaner nationalists allied with the English-speaking Labour Party. According to white South African demography, social classes and voting patterns during 1922-24, the change of government was a forerunner of the decisive 1948 general election. Thereafter, the National Party (NP) held political power for 46 years. Finally, 1922 demonstrated the white South African state’s determination to use extreme violence, if necessary, to defend itself from insurrection by its own racial kin too, whether Afrikaner or English South African.

Several competing visions existed among white politics in 1922. A politically dominant middle-class community of white South Africans blended together into a dominion within the British Empire. A return to 1899 and an Afrikaner nationalist-dominated republic, or, for the extreme left wing, leaders like Percy Fischer and Henry Spendiff envisaged a (white) communist state based upon Vladimir Lenin’s Soviet Union model. The Union of Soviet Socialist Republic (USSR) was just emerging from ruinous civil war and undergoing a temporary ideological reverse through the New Economic Policy, as opposed to the murderous and dictatorial War Communism. To working men across Europe and her colonial offshoots, indifferent or ignorant to the real vast suffering of the Russian people, the USSR represented their hopes of ending the exploitation they sensed lay at the core of their difficult lives.

In Johannesburg, white workers burned with antipathy against mine owners and the SAP government alike: antagonism which had long bedevilled labour relations in the South African mining industry. For today’s middle-class South Africans, it would be difficult to appreciate the hatred which the 1922 strikers felt towards Smuts, the SAP government and the Rand lords. For the workers, the latter epitomised all the sins of greed and avarice. Miners perceived their slaving in highly dangerous and unhealthy conditions as their bosses’ method to maximise both profits and their own luxurious lifestyles.

The spark to the 1922 explosion occurred in the wake of earlier strikes during 1907, 1913 and 1914, particularly, when two dozen or more workers were killed in clashes with police and military units. The mine owners remained determined to cut their white workers’ wage costs. White miners had clung ferociously to their privileged occupational status for decades — being racially entrenched as the skilled and semi-skilled workers, as opposed to the significantly more numerous black unskilled labourers. But the mine owners had done their calculations. The white workers made up 20 000 of the 200 000-strong labour force, while their wage bill doubled that of their black counterparts. The Chamber of Mines announced that besides reordering underground work by forcing white supervisors to take charge of three rather than two underground drills, the highest-paid white workers were to receive wage cuts, while some 2 000 workers faced being laid off. There was little or no consultation. Nine decades ago among the descendents of the white colonists and settlers, the employer-employee relations were markedly harsh. The mine owners’ top priority was the maximisation of profits in terrain where exploitation of deep low-yield gold ore depended upon cheap mass labour.

The white workers were hardly without comprehensible grievances. Their skills and work ethic had been fundamental since the industry was established some three decades earlier. Unlike the black workers they could not retreat to any pastoral lifestyle, for their survival depended upon their jobs. The mine owners knew that black miners could and would do the skilled work for less.

But the miners’ difficult lives were no different from the state’s agents who rallied against them — members of the police and military, whose lives also hung upon frugal salaries. My own grandfather, Lieutenant Algernon Sparks, a UDF regular officer and World War 1 veteran, suffered a near fatal gunshot wound while leading his troops towards striker positions in Benoni. He was lucky, for dozens of servicemen were to lose their lives. One of 1922’s many tragedies was the involvement of thousands of men among both strikers and state forces who served together in the Great War. This military experience of men accustomed to the mercilessness of 20th-century war exacerbated the 1922 violence and there was a great deal of brutality directed towards real and perceived scabs, black miners, mine officials and captured government soldiers or policemen.

The government and its supporters reflected middle-class revulsion and fear of Lenin-style totalitarianism with its nightmarish dispossession and murder of property owners. Visions of a horrific class war becoming a reality impelled Smuts to act with harshness towards men who, although they were exploited, still lived more comfortable lives than their equivalents in Europe.

Afrikaner urbanisation in the wake of the Boer War had ensured that by 1922, at least one in two white miners was Afrikaans. Some of the Afrikaner strike leaders assumed their rural kin would seize the opportunity of forcibly displacing the perceived Anglo-centric SAP government. During the initial stages of the uprising, the state reeled before the rebels with central Johannesburg, Newlands and Benoni virtually falling into striker hands. Several contingents of police, pre-armed with military rifles and bayonets, had been forced to surrender. In fact, research has demonstrated that some of the Afrikaner policemen were sympathetic to the Afrikaner miners’ demands and republican goals. Yet as in the 1914 Afrikaner Rebellion when burger commando reinforcements were called up, they responded dutifully and lawfully, despite a good many of these men being explicit supporters of the NP. The strikers’ expectation of rural Afrikaners’ support was a grave miscalculation and curiously many of the Boer military reservists perceived themselves as “fighting the English uitlanders again”. There is also no doubt that for some burgers, significant looting opportunities were an added attraction, for many defeated strikers returned to find their homes plundered and damaged by state forces.

With military operations directed by senior UDF officers, utilising the equipment and tactics of World War 1, the defence force bombed, shelled and shot the spirit out of the strikers. The defeated workers attained no work-related gains from their putative insurrection. Many were dismissed, four were hanged and others imprisoned, while the mining magnates stuck to their original decisions, ensuring white miners would be employed more cheaply and in fewer numbers. There were over 200 fatal casualties and many more were injured during the space of a week. The miners’ strike was thoroughly crushed by the South African state, but with political repercussions that cut deeply into our political future.

• Dr Rodney Warwick is a history teacher in Cape Town.

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.