Adriaan Basson

Blame the NPA, not AfriForum, for shambolic Malema corruption case

2018-04-23 10:08
EFF leader Julius Malema. (City Press)

EFF leader Julius Malema. (City Press)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

The chaotic way in which the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) has handled the prosecution of EFF leader Julius Malema has accentuated the urgent need for intervention at the authority.

The NPA has opened itself up for criticism from Malema and AfriForum's private prosecutions unit, led by former prosecutor Gerrie Nel, for dragging its feet since August 2015 when the Limpopo High Court struck the matter off the roll.

The NPA has now handed AfriForum a political victory by placing itself in a position where it is forced to give a firm commitment that it will decide about recharging Malema in August this year. Malema has predictably called AfriForum's move racist.

None of this would have been necessary had the NPA done its job.

To recap: City Press revealed in 2011 that Malema's Ratanang Family Trust, named after his son, was a shareholder in the tender-rich On-Point Engineering, a company run by Malema's engineer friend Lesiba Gwangwa. At the time Malema was ANC Youth League leader and a powerful power broker in his home province of Limpopo.

On-Point Engineering won a number of government tenders, mainly a R52m contract to set-up a "project management unit" in the provincial roads and transport department. The State alleges that Malema benefitted financially from the tender, through his trust, and bought a farm and a Mercedes-Benz with the money.

Malema and his co-accused first appeared in court in 2013. The case was postponed several times during which some of the accused were removed from the case. At the final appearance in Polokwane before Judge George Mothle in August 2015, Malema and Gwangwa appeared without the third accused, On-Point director Kagiso Dichabe.

When the NPA applied for a further postponement, because of Dichabe's ill health, Mothle declined and struck the matter off the court roll – temporary legal relief. During the same appearance, Malema unsuccessfully applied to be tried separately to prevent further delays.

The EFF leader wanted to "clear his name" and "prevent the further delay of justice".

Every accused has the constitutional right to a fair trial within a reasonable period of time. Unlike former president Jacob Zuma, Malema has not attempted to delay his trial through legal shenanigans. He has consistently asked the NPA to expedite his hearing. By August, it would have taken the NPA another three years to decide whether to reinstate the charges.

Malema has denied receiving bribes through his family trust and has alleged that the NPA, through its former acting head Nomgcobo Jiba in cahoots with former justice minister Jeff Radebe, took a political decision to charge him to deter his political ambitions. Malema, through his lawyers, will probably put up this argument if and when his trial starts.

Understandably, Malema would not want to be an accused in a corruption trial when he and his party are on the campaign trail for the 2019 general election. This is a make-or-break election for the EFF, one which will show if the party can lift itself beyond the 7% support mark.

Apart from racial rhetoric and radical land expropriation, anti-corruption has been a pillar of the EFF's mantra since its inception. The party played a pivotal role in exposing Zuma's complicity in the Nkandla scandal and keeping him accountable. 

Malema can hardly be seen as trying to dodge corruption allegations against him when he champions clean governance as part of the EFF's manifesto.

Instead of blaming AfriForum – opportunistic as its move may be – Malema should direct his wrath at advocate Shaun Abrahams and the NPA for failing to make a decision about his prosecution for almost three years.

As for Abrahams, his days are probably numbered. President Cyril Ramaphosa is awaiting the judgment by the Constitutional Court on the appointment of a prosecutions boss before he replaces Abrahams, as the North Gauteng High Court directed him to do.

The NPA needs a strong, principled lawyer to restore its image as a prosecutor without fear or favour. 

It is embarrassing that the NPA had to be moved by an opportunistic lobby group to do its job in the Malema case. 

- Basson is editor of News24. Follow him on Twitter @adriaanbasson

Read more on:    afriforum  |  npa  |  julius malema  |  judiciary


Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.