No amount of champagne, cakes or booze-fuelled parties can mask the reality of the what the ANC has become.
Mostly cloudy. Mild.
Andreas SpäthClimate change didn’t enter the 2012 US presidential elections as a topic worth debating until superstorm Sandy knocked out the nation’s most populous city. But before we point accusing fingers at those clueless Americans, we should ask ourselves how serious we and our own government have taken this issue.For years, the vast majority of the world’s climate scientists have warned that we need to restrict average global temperature increases to a maximum of 2oC above pre-industrial levels in order to prevent catastrophic and irreversible climate change.At COP-15, the 2009 UN climate conference in Copenhagen, this 2oC target was officially agreed on by the signatories to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Many experts now believe that the target is too high and that we should be aiming at 1.5 oC to be safe.A new analysis by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) predicts that we’re headed for 6oC by the end of this century. According to the international accounting firm’s Low Carbon Economy Index 2012, entitled “Too late for two degrees?”, the pace of reducing global emissions of greenhouse gasses has been way too slow.While reductions in the carbon intensity (i.e. the emissions per unit of GDP) of countries like the UK, Germany and France reached rates as high as 6% or more in 2010-2011, they appear to have stalled in the world’s emerging economies. The so-called E7 group of countries (China, India, Brazil, Mexico, Russia, Indonesia, Turkey) now emit more than the G7 countries (USA, France, UK, Germany, Italy, Japan, Canada).According to the PwC report, the global economy has to decrease its collective carbon intensity by a massive 5.1% annually until the year 2050 to stand a chance of achieving the 2oC target – a rate never achieved in any single year since World War 2. “Even to have a reasonable prospect of getting to a 4°C scenario would imply nearly quadrupling the current rate of decarbonisation,” says the study.So does this mean that we’re toast? That the 2oC target is a pipedream and that we’re doomed to follow the Ancient Maya in succumbing to drastic climate change?Not quite yet, but we do need to urgently decide how we are going to respond to this depressing news? It seems to me that we have three options. Take your pick:1. Business as usualThere are a number of reasons why you might think that we should simply carry on burning oil, gas and coal, regardless of the consequences:- you don’t believe in climate change in the first place;- you think that any detrimental effects have been vastly exaggerated;- you have faith in the powers of the “free market” to sort things out in the end;- you’re looking forward to the long-awaited collapse of capitalism;- you believe that global warming is a natural phenomenon that humans can’t do anything about; or- you just don’t give a damn.2. Addressing the symptomsYou may argue that we should focus our attention on:- developing technologies to help us and future generations adapt to life on a warming planet;- capturing and safely storing enough of the carbon we pump into the atmosphere to mitigate our continued reliance on fossil fuels; or- searching for geoengineering solutions, like dumping iron dust into the oceans to stimulate CO2-trapping plankton blooms, or launching space mirrors to shield us from the sun’s radiation.3. Tackling the causesLike most environmentalists you may believe that the way to go is to transition to a low-carbon economy by:- maximising energy efficiency; and- replacing fossil fuels with renewable energy alternatives such as wind and solar power.Personally, I’ve long been a supporter of option 3, but a considerable need for adaptation to the symptoms of climate change now seems inevitable. The authors of the PwC index agree, calling for “radical transformations in the way the global economy currently functions: rapid uptake of renewable energy, sharp falls in fossil fuel use or massive deployment of CCS [carbon capture and storage], removal of industrial emissions and halting deforestation.”Which option do you choose?- Andreas freelance writer with a PhD in geochemistry. Follow him on Twitter: @Andreas_SpathSend
your comments to Andreas
Disclaimer: News24 encourages freedom of speech and the
expression of diverse views. The views of columnists published on
News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the
views of News24.
24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.
Upcoming Volkswagen Golf 8 seen driving in the Western Cape.
From the top student of 2019 to the province with the best matric results.
Three epic motorsport crashes Fernando Alonso walked away from.
Why not switch up your playlist?
Tim Tebow is on his way to SA!
Add a few changes to your workout routine?
10-year-old with rare skin condition
...scratches at his feet.
Western CapeWest Coast PersonnelR20 000.00 - R25 000.00 Per Month
Western CapeCelsa Properties
Western CapeMass Staffing ProjectsR40 000.00 - R55 000.00 Per Month
R 6 999 000
R 18 000 000
R 4 950 000
We subscribe to the Press Code.
You choose what you want
News24 on Android
Get the latest from News24 on your Android device.
Terms and Conditions
24.com Terms and Conditions - Updated April 2012
Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.
This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.