Are drivers really dumping drunk driving?

2012-03-05 07:27

Chris Moerdyk

Is that a faint glimmer of light I see at the end of South Africa's tunnel of road death?

Research conducted by Synovate last year has shown an increase in the number of South Africans who have put their hands on their hearts and swore blind they would not drive if they felt they had too much to drink.

OK, so the shift is a minuscule four per cent but heck, at least its heading in the right direction. Unlike years and even decades ago when the situation was just going from bad to worse to indescribably shocking.

But, research aside, I get the feeling that more and more drivers are recognising the fact that it really is quite stupid to drink and drive.

Not all that long ago, I used to hear people boasting about how to avoid road blocks after a night out on the tiles.

Certainly in the circles within which I move, no-one brags about that anymore because they know someone is going to jump down their throats and bring up subjects like children and nuns being killed by drunk drivers.

A change in attitude

Somehow, the social unacceptability of drinking and driving has started to manifest itself. Try it whenever you are next in a gathering of family or friends. Try boasting about how clever you are at drinking as though there was no tomorrow and still being able to avoid the roadblocks.

Interestingly enough, I started noticing a change in attitude round about the time a local liquor company called Brandhouse started running a graphic ad campaign called "Papa wag vir jou" with scenes inside jails with all sorts of really dodgy looking inmates just waiting for you to be nabbed at a roadblock and chucked in chooky with them for the night.

Now, I see there's a new campaign based on the theme "Who's driving you home tonight" and also showing scenes such as two cops next to a police van holding the door open for you.

Now, what appeals to me about this advertising is that it is what I call "positive shock" as against "negative shock".

Negative shock is showing pictures of dead bodies lying all over the road at an accident scene, or maybe a kid in a hospital ICU after being hit by a drunk driver.

Seeing strangers

Oh yes I know countries like New Zealand say that works for them but South Africa is different. New Zealand has excellent policing and dead bodies lying around is not a common sight. In South Africa the sight of dead bodies lying around pretty commonplace. And there isn't much policing.

The problem with these ads is that you and I look at them and all we see are strangers. They're not us. It doesn’t look like our neighbourhood and that wrecked car isn't ours.

Which just makes us think that all these terrible things happen to someone else.

But, positive shock ads are those in which we are very easily able to put ourselves in a specific. Like in jail or in a police van.

Are these ads working? Well, it’s hard to say. But, I was very impressed to see that when I went onto YouTube to have another look at those "Papa Wag vir Jou" commercials again I noticed that 136 000 people had also had a look.  Which suggests to me that this campaign certainly had become quite a talking point around dinner tables for that many people to go and find out what everyone was talking about.

It’s not a huge number of people but it’s a good indicator of interest. Having said that I must say that it has worked for me. I am now in my third month of not drinking and driving at all. And it’s not as hard as it sounds. What convinced me? Certain the Brandhouse campaign but also the Independent Newspapers "name and shame" campaign last year.

Face the problem together

Something else that I find encouraging is that in my ongoing interest in governments plan to ban alcohol advertising, I have noticed a far greater determination by the major players in the liquor industry to contribute a lot more to combating alcohol abuse.

I also have the feeling that government is a lot more willing now, to actually engage with the liquor industry and not just treat them as a mortal enemy.

I am a fan of Health Minister Aaron Motsoaledi in spite of differing with him on the whole advertising issue. He is the first health minister we have had who seems to be getting things done.

I believe implicitly, that the only way that the scourge of alcohol abuse is going to be properly addressed is if Government, the liquor industry and most importantly, the media, stop fighting each other but rather face the problem together.

A year ago I would have laughed at this suggestion, but my latest studies on the subject show that this is now a very real possibility. And about time too.

So tell me. Do you have the balls to admit in public that you don’t drink and drive anymore?   

- Follow Chris on Twitter.

Send your comments to Chris

Disclaimer: News24 encourages freedom of speech and the expression of diverse views. The views of columnists published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24.

  • Stephen - 2012-03-05 09:13

    I agree. People's attitude are definately changing. Nowdays it not uncommon to find spouses driving their husbands home even when they have just two or three beers - just to be on the safe side. The increase in road blocks has also helped in changing peoples attitude.

      StarStruck - 2012-03-05 10:31

      The increased road blocks are the only reason which was about time. What where the police doing with their time before their current weekend programs became norm? I saw a drug dealer this weekend driving a Polo and phoned 10111. The person taking the information was a well-spoken black woman, taking all the information I had about the guy, typed it into a computer and sent it to the vehicles in the area. I was very impressed and would not hesitate to phone 10111 again. What an improvement from a few years back. On the other hand I firstly phoned the police station in the area where I saw the drug dealer. The woman who answered the call could not even speak English to a degree where she could actually take information and I had to repeat myself with every word. I had no choice but to hang-up.

      Regan - 2012-03-05 12:10

      @ star struck, sa has 11 official languages. i wonder how many of them you are fluent in

      StarStruck - 2012-03-06 15:41

      Regan - Why is it so difficult to understand that English is the mainstream communication channel between all of these languages? Why should people waste their time to learn all of these languages if English stands as the mainstream channel? Rather take on something that will better your life. I prefer to rather learn something that would help make my life better in the long run, like a new trade or expanding the knowledge I have in my current trade. Is it then not fair to expect the emergency services staff to then at least understand English?

  • walterpike - 2012-03-05 09:31

    Chris - I am not sure that you are right. firstly that it was the brandhouse campaign that caused that shift, nor that the change is significant at all in statistical terms.

  • freddie.smuts - 2012-03-05 09:43

    Even after a couple of Whiskeys I drive better, more carefully and more responsible thatn all taxis on SA roads. More laws, like the current which aren't enforced just give more opputunity to corrupt cops to extortiate bribes.

  • jyellin1 - 2012-03-05 09:43

    I would be VERY interested to see this Synovate research... I'll hazard a guess that it's not statistically representative of the entire SA population

  • Vaal-Donkie - 2012-03-05 10:12

    The only fault I can find with Chris' piece is that he still seems to believe that the government has our best interests at heart.

  • gerry.pelser - 2012-03-05 10:35

    I see Big Brother has removed my comments. Again. Free speech is only okay if your're politically correct and toe the line.

      Vaal-Donkie - 2012-03-05 10:45

      If only it was that simple. It's like they remove comments at random. Sometimes I can call a black spade a lazy spade, but sometimes I'm not even allowed to criticise someone's taste in cars. It's totally random I tell you.

  • Nicholas - 2012-03-05 11:22

    Its crazy that we are in a situation that we have to explore the psychology of advertising as a deterrent to drunken driving. The elephant in the room of course is the complete lack of law enforcement. Laws on the statute books allow people to be put away for years as well as fines so devastating that most people would never recover. Not once have these laws ever been fully enforced regardless of the tens of thousands arrested annually for drunken driving. Wouldn't it be easier to just enforce the law as a deterrent instead of scratching our heads trying to think up all these other creative ways of "shocking" people through advertising which clearly does not work?

  • Alex - 2012-03-05 13:08

    These horrific stats are trotted out year after year, season after season. How many are aware that there is no distinction between drunk drivers and drunk pedestrians? Recently I saw a drunk pedestrian wobble about 20m from a roadblock on the N2 - cops didn't bat an eyelid. Knock him over, stone cold sober, and it's another "drunken driving" incident. Cobblers - get the drunk pedestrians and the drunk drivers off the roads

  • pretoriawebdesigner - 2012-03-07 08:43

    I haven't done that since the 80's

  • Shannon - 2012-03-14 08:47

    Wow, does it really take courage to admit you don't drink and drive? I've never done it and I've been driving almost 20 years. Totally socially unacceptable in my circles, which was a far greater deterrent than laws or ad campaigns.

  • pages:
  • 1