Our obsession with the ANC is keeping us from engaging about what is really important. We fail deliberately in rescuing the public dialogue, writes Ralph Mathekga.
Mostly sunny. Cool.
South African Rand.
Multimedia · User Galleries · News in Pictures
Send us your pictures · Send us your stories
In virtually every metric, free-market liberalism is more conducive to human prosperity and environmental sustainability, not to mention individual liberty and dignity. So why does it get such a bad rap, asks Martin van Staden.
In the midst of the transition from apartheid to
democracy, the then CEO of the Institute of Race Relations, John Kane-Berman,
prophetically noted that defending liberalism was about to get more difficult
than it was during the authoritarian rule of the National Party.
Intuition tells us that with a liberal Constitution
and the victory of liberal democracy over communism around the world, the
opposite should have been true. Yet, today, in 2019, 25 years after South
Africa became a democracy, liberalism is still misunderstood, misrepresented
The latest instance of this is Jeremy Cronin's column
excuse for Zille's hatchet-job analysis of state capture". While the
column is evidently mostly about Helen Zille, my interest is in the offhanded
remarks at the end of his article, where he writes that the anti-apartheid liberalism
of Helen Suzman and the Black Sash is to be welcomed, but the "vulgarised"
liberalism of "the likes of the Free Market Foundation", is not,
apparently because of the "ecocidal implications" of free markets.
The Free Market Foundation (FMF) was founded in 1975,
explicitly in protest against the policies of the apartheid regime. While the
National Party lauded itself on being a defender of the free enterprise system,
this was nothing but a ruse to warm itself up to Western powers in the context
of the Cold War. Instead, the National Party government was very much engaged
in what the FMF called "creeping socialism". This was evident with
the multitudes of agricultural and industrial control boards, fixed prices,
group area laws, restrictions on land usage, broadcasting control and a host of
other illiberal, anti-market practices.
READ: On Putin, the end of liberalism and the dangerous figures in SA's democracy
But most importantly, the FMF objected to what has
turned out to be apartheid's greatest crime against humanity: The denial of
property rights to the majority of South Africans. This is why, in the 1980s
already, the FMF was actively lobbying the government of PW Botha to end the
tyranny of leasehold in peri-urban townships and replace it with unambiguous,
titled ownership. Botha and his anti-market government refused, until
circumstances forced the Nationalists in the early 1990s to adopt the Upgrading
of Land Tenure Rights Act and slowly start titling urban land. This process
continues – painfully slowly – today, with the FMF's Khaya Lam (My Home) land
reform project trying its utmost to facilitate the process.
The FMF's mission has remained consistently simple and
liberal from 1975 to today: to free ordinary South Africans from the usually
arbitrary, sometimes capricious, and always ignorant whims and preferences of
politicians and bureaucrats, and allow them to make decisions for themselves,
so long as these decisions do not hamper the same right and ability of others
to do the same. We pursued this mission knowing that liberalism was not only the
only morally legitimate philosophy by which to govern society, but that it was
also the most utilitarian. Without exception, throughout history and today,
where markets are freer from government interference, prosperity is greater.
Compare, for instance, every annual edition of the
Fraser Institute and FMF's Economic Freedom
of the World index with every annual edition of the Human Development Index, and you will see the same result:
Countries with stronger protections for private property rights and free
enterprise tend to have lower levels of poverty. The most striking instance of
this phenomenon is the fact that in those countries that have the highest level
of economic freedom – the freest markets in the world – the poorest 10% of the
population is about eight times wealthier
than the poorest 10% of the population in those countries with the lowest
levels of economic freedom – the most-regulated markets in the world. In other
words, the poor fare best where the market is free.
This brings us to Cronin's point about environmental
The tragedy of the commons is the phenomenon where
natural resources are depleted or destroyed because they are owned or possessed
in common, meaning there is no discernible owner. When we use things that we do
not own, we tend to use them more recklessly with a view to maximising
short-term, immediate benefit. In sixteenth-century England, for instance,
farmers overgrazed their cattle on "common" pastures.
In contrast, when dealing with resources that we own,
we use them with a view to maximise our long-term, sustainable benefit. Thus,
in England, the overgrazing stopped when private property rights were
introduced into the equation. This is also why endangered species are better
protected as private property: Their owners know that if the specie dies out,
so does any possibility of them drawing profit from that specie.
Animals that are today endangered did not get to that
point because they were hunted to the point of extinction on private game
farms, but because they were hunted to the point of extinction on so-called
public property, like South Africa's national parks. While private game owners
might profit from making their property available to be hunted, they will seek
to maximise the game's population (thus averting extinction) for the sustainability
of their enterprise. And this is done in their own self-interest. As Michael
Rieger points out, environmentalism is profitable.
It is also interesting to note that it was after the fall of the communist Soviet
Union and the Warsaw Pact in 1990 that the new countries, especially Estonia
and Ukraine, reduced their carbon emissions by some of the highest rates in the
world – 39.4% and 70.4% respectively. Self-described socialist economies like
Venezuela, Laos, China and Vietnam, on the other hand, increased their
emissions between 59.3% and 927%.
In virtually every metric, free-market liberalism is
more conducive to human prosperity and environmental sustainability, not to
mention individual liberty and dignity, than any other system. Even the
Scandinavian countries which are today lauded by socialists have some of the
freest markets in the world, and their massive welfare states are built on centuries
worth of virtually-unbridled economic freedom. Liberalism around the world, and
particularly in South Africa, must continue to be seen in that light.
- Martin van Staden is Head: Legal Policy and -Research
at the Free Market Foundation and is pursuing a Master of Laws degree at the
University of Pretoria. He is author of The
Constitution and the Rule of Law (2019).
Disclaimer: News24 encourages freedom of speech and the expression of diverse views. The views of columnists published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24.
A true SA classic that makes Winter bearable.
Fly, Stay and Earn!
"You may be able to pursue compensation for your child’s personal injury."
Social media plays a massive role in how Lewis Hamilton is perceived.
Plus, the three attributes that make her a visionary
Volkswagen breathes fresh air into the SUV segment with the new T-Roc Cabriolet.
Here are 5 trailers you must watch!
There's a mesmerising beauty in watching water fall and foam from great heights.
Cape Town CBDRecruit DigitalR15 000.00 - R20 000.00 Per Month
Cape TownSpecifying PersonnelR470 000.00 - R500 000.00 Per Year
Western CapeNDC Personnel & Contractors CC
R 6 300 000
R 5 600 000
R 6 500 000
We subscribe to the Press Code.
You choose what you want
News24 on Android
Get the latest from News24 on your Android device.
Terms and Conditions
24.com Terms and Conditions - Updated April 2012
Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.
This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.