Guest Column

OPINION | Society needs a new conception of work and labour

2020-05-21 11:30
We should value all forms of labour, says the writer. (iStock)

We should value all forms of labour, says the writer. (iStock)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

South Africa’s labour movement, employers and labour regulatory authorities need to adapt to the changing industrial relations environment. 


Employment has featured prominently in Covid-19 public policy debates. This discourse primarily focuses on employment security and measures for retaining existing jobs across the economy.

South Africans' heightened concerns about jobs is justified in a policy context with persistent unemployment and inequality.

The National Treasury estimates that our economy will shed close to seven million jobs in the following months.

The government's half a trillion economic relief package aims to ameliorate the Covid-19 socio-economic impacts. It was developed in response to ongoing public policy debates on employment and livelihood security.

One factor omitted in these deliberations is a need for reconceptualising notions of work in society.

Covid-19 amplifies historical policy economy debates on new forms of work and labour conceptions.

The global capitalist system has experienced several forms of restructuring over the past decades, and this impacts labour across varies societies.

Covid-19 exposes the limitations of a narrow industrial labour regime, which overlooks technological change and social reproduction when debating labour policies.  

The primary sign of this oversight is the undervaluing of care labour undertaken by nurses, social workers, day care employees, community healthcare workers and early childhood development practitioners.

Care work is at the centre of South Africa’s Covid-19 response, even though it has been systemically underfunded over the past years.

Structural Adjustment Programmes nudged governments to reduce expenditure on public goods, which subsequently resulted in precarious formal paid care work.

However, not all care work is paid. The International Labour Organisation Care Work (2018) report highlights that a large amount of care work is unpaid.

It takes place in homes and communities where women bear the brunt of social reproduction.  This unpaid work is gendered because "women perform 76.2 per cent of the total amount of unpaid care work, 3.2 times more time than men".

Society needs an alternative conception of work and labour, which dedicates substantial support (finance and institutional) to forms of labour that operate outside industrial production sites.

This policy shift will create additional income sources and other multiplier effects for human well-being. More importantly, it increases the nation's resilience and responses during an epidemic.  

Another significant consideration is a need for an alternative conception of labour productivity.

The current labour regime still views rigid control measures over employees as essential instruments for maintaining productivity.

These include fixed working hours, time control schedules, controlled office work and hierarchical organisational systems, which afford employees minimal participation in managing how work is conducted or supervised in companies.

There are several studies challenging this practice in workplaces, and these findings cut across different research fields like economics, industrial psychology and industrial labour studies.

South Africa’s labour market paradigm neglects these contemporary public policy debates on the relationship between productivity and organisational structural change.

Companies can achieve significant productivity gains while improving employees' holistic well-being through decreasing rigid workplace control measures.

The use of technology in the transition towards digitisation in some economic sectors has the potential to facilitate a shift in labour productivity strategies.  

There are varied technologies emerging as part of the transition towards a digital economy.

These innovations use artificial intelligence and algorithms to make technology accessible to businesses, employees and customers. Increased digitisation, especially in the service sectors, creates market disruption and challenges regulatory frameworks.

Our labour law regulatory regime is based on the Fordist industrial structure, which privileges the standard employment relationship.

Several labour movement writers have studied how the restructuring of capitalist production systems over the past decades questions traditional work conceptions.

They have tried to nudge trade unions and the broader labour movement towards developing adequate organising strategies.

The preliminary evidence indicates that South Africa’s labour movement is still far from adapting to these structural shifts.  But this regulatory challenge is not a trade union and labour movement matter only.

The state, through its labour regime and institutions, also needs to be responsive to economic structural changes.  

A clear example of this conundrum is the ongoing debate about the status and work of Uber drivers.

The company has attempted, with some success, to evade various regulatory frameworks.

It argues that it is not a transport company and does not employ the drivers.

This trans-national corporation uses its peculiar business model, based on the algorithm-driven application to justify these claims. Uber states that the drivers are independent contractors who engage with the application.

The Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) and the Labour Court ruled differently on this matter over the past few years.

This conundrum has led to class conflict, violence and deepened inequality in the passenger taxi transport industry.

South Africa’s labour movement, employers and labour regulatory authorities need to adapt to the changing industrial relations environment. 

Furthermore, society should value all forms of labour, especially the paid and unpaid care work that is essential for human well-being in households or communities.

The Covid-19 crisis amplifies these two points is several ways and shows that class analysis constantly changes.

It is, therefore, important to root our new conceptions of labour in emerging industrial analyses and care work.  

- Khwezi Mabasa, Senior Researcher at the Mapungubwe Institute for Strategic Reflection 

Read more on:    coronavirus  |  work  |  jobs  |  economy  |  pandemic
X

SHARE:

Inside News24

 
/News
Lockdown For
DAYS
HRS
MINS
Traffic Alerts
Traffic
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.