Guest Column

Putting an end to the 'grant queen' fallacy

2019-04-29 14:00
Social grants are to increase.PHOTO: Phindile Shozi

Social grants are to increase.PHOTO: Phindile Shozi

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

The narrative that women have children to get the social grants for them within the South African context is almost a carbon copy of its American counterpart. Both are fallacies, writes Mikhail Petersen.

There are many narratives that have been perpetuated through society for such a long time that we just take them as being factually correct. This is a dangerous phenomenon. We need to constantly challenge such wisdom that is taken for granted. Because in most cases this "wisdom" is factually incorrect.

A perfect example of one of these narratives is that of the "child welfare queen" or "grant queen". These are said to be unemployed women who have children for the express purpose of collecting the social grants that come from having these children.

This narrative continues, becomes more insidious and implies that these women purposely do not work. Why would they when they can just push out babies and collect money from the state for doing nothing?

When one does the research from where this narrative emerged one can trace it roots to the presidential campaign of Ronald Reagan in 1976. It was based on Linda Taylor, a woman who defrauded hundreds of thousands of dollars from various government agencies through the use of 33 aliases.

However, when one looks at the reality of the American context, fraud counts for less than 2% of unemployment insurance payments. However the narrative continues to be spread with many being of the opinion that such grants will encourage recipients to not look for jobs.

A quote which captures this perfectly is from Franklin Roosevelt, who characterised the social grant system as "a narcotic, that is a subtle destroyer of the human spirit".

Conversely, a comparative study held in Mexico, Morocco, Honduras, Nicaragua and Indonesia found that there was no systematic evidence that cash transfer programs for those in need discourage work whatsoever. A World Bank report from 2001 found that such monies (contrary to the dominant narrative) were not typically squandered on things like tobacco and alcohol. 

Yet another study conducted in 1995 in the United States analysed the rate of births to unwed mothers to shed light on this issue. This study found that welfare payments didn't increase single motherhood. Another report in the US showed that cash welfare systems early in a child's life improve the child's longtime educational attainment, nutritional status and income in their adulthood.

The narrative that women have children to get the social grants for them within the South African context is almost a carbon copy of its American counterpart. There is the archetypal black woman who uses government aid and grants to support her lavish life. She is too lazy to find a job. The story is perpetuated by finding one case of such abuse and applying it to every social grant recipient in the nation.

However, in South Africa the benefits of the welfare system have seen a shift in the number of black people living in absolute poverty since 1994. Goldman Sachs' 20 year evaluation of South Africa, which was released in 2013 showed that the number of black people that are living below the poverty line in 1993 was 70%. This figure has dropped to 61% in 2008. The study found that that this was largely due to government spending on social safety nets.

Let's also add the caveat that the current money given per child for a child grant is R420. I fail to see someone deciding to not seek for work, but instead take on the massive financial responsibility that comes with child care for a measly R420 a month.

A final fact which I hope will put a nail in the coffin of this insidious social grant/welfare queen narrative is a report conducted by the Centre for the Social Development in South Africa. The report noted that social grants have enhanced women's power and control over their households and also enhances their decision making in financial matters. As such I believe it's high time that we throw this harmful and factually false narrative in the dustbin of history where it belongs.

- Mikhail Petersen holds a Bachelors of Social Science degree in Politics and Economic History as well as an LLB from UCT. Mikhail is an intern within the Sustained Dialogue Programme at the Institute for Justice and Reconciliation. 

Disclaimer: News24 encourages freedom of speech and the expression of diverse views. The views of columnists published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24. ener is a specialist reporter for News24.

Read more on:    social grants
X

Ace's ANC vs Cyril's ANC

2019-05-20 05:02
NEXT ON NEWS24X

Ace's ANC vs Cyril's ANC

2019-05-20 05:02

SHARE:

Inside News24

 
Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.