VC’s agreement upholds UCT core values

2016-12-07 11:30
UCT Vice-Chancellor Dr Max Price. Photo: Jaco Marais

UCT Vice-Chancellor Dr Max Price. Photo: Jaco Marais

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Gwen Ngwenya’s call for a motion of no confidence in University of Cape Town Vice-Chancellor Dr Max Price is based on a largely erroneous understanding of an agreement signed between the UCT executive and students representing a group of protesters. The agreement is explained by Dr Price here. This response addresses specific points Ms Ngwenya raised.

She refers to the agreement signatories as “unelected and unrepresentative students” and to “the lack of representation of the broader student body”. The agreement does not pretend to represent the views of the broader student body but specifically to address some of the articulated issues which partially led to disruption on the UCT campus. It was intended to create a quiet space, after weeks of disruptions by protesters, for two processes: first, to allow for the completion of final exams for students in November 2016 (in which it succeeded); second, to create a platform for establishing a process to address a range of underlying issues that have fuelled protests on campus for the last 18 months. 

The agreement makes clear that the Institutional Reconciliation and Transformation Commission (IRTC), which will oversee this process, will call for contributions from all university stakeholders. It will allow for different voices to be heard. The terms of reference for the IRTC, its scope, modus operandi and its process forward, are now being drafted. The commissioners themselves will be independent of UCT and the protesting students. All members of the UCT community are encouraged to contribute to this process – individually and in their various constituencies.
It must be noted that after the signing of the agreement, disruptions did cease.

Ms Ngwenya claims that the agreement allows “lawbreakers who have been party to violence on campus [to be] party to their own disciplinary process”. This is not true. The possibility of clemency has been agreed for 12 students who were involved in protest-related activities in February 2016 (during “Shackville”). These students were all brought before the UCT Student Disciplinary Tribunal, found guilty and sanctioned, which included some rustications and some expulsions. Clemency would  only be granted on an individual basis (not blanket for all) if the students signed a clemency declaration admitting to their actions, acknowledged that these actions were wrong, committed to refraining from such behaviour in future and agreed to abide by the university’s code of conduct for students in future. The clemency can be revoked if students are found guilty of similar offences in future.

The IRTC will assess each individual’s actions and context and determine whether the seriousness of the actions, the proportionality to the context, motivation and other factors justify granting clemency. This will involve the commissioners, not the students, assessing the disciplinary process that was followed. 

Ms Ngwenya complains that there is “no agreed definition by the university on what decolonisation entails”. Certainly this should be viewed as a strength rather than a shortcoming: rather than imposing one definition of a term with wide ranges of meaning, UCT is seeking different views from across the campus, to gain deeper understanding of the issues. The university has called for discussion on what decolonisation might mean in practical terms, for instance for various curricula requirements in the different faculties. What the agreement allows for is discussion on this term. This strikes to the very heart of the academic project.

Ms Ngwenya says that “the university has not asserted its own values in the agreement”.  On the contrary:  academic freedom and the right of individuals to freedom of expression are very strong values of UCT. By establishing a process for an IRTC to take place, the university is creating a platform where all members of the campus community, including alumni, staff, students, unions and other stakeholders, can speak on the issues under discussion, free from the intimidation that has been one of the characteristics of protests and disruptions this year. 

* Dianna Yach is a member of Council and Chair of the Alumni Advisory Board at the University of Cape Town.

Disclaimer: News24 encourages freedom of speech and the expression of diverse views. The views of columnists published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24.

Read more on:    feesmustfall

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.