The dignity of the state capture commission has been held up by Zondo's personal approach. Even the most reluctant witness could not gather the rudeness to withdraw.
EFF members leave the chamber while Minister of State Enterprises Pravin Gordhan address the House. (Jan Gerber, News24)
Multimedia · User Galleries · News in Pictures
Send us your pictures · Send us your stories
As with any institution, abiding by the rules should be a precondition of membership. Perhaps it is time to change the law so that once MPs have broken too many rules, too many times, they lose their seats, writes Melanie Verwoerd.
the EFF were up to their old tricks in Parliament. Needing a new enemy, they turned
on Pravin Gordhan.
Gordhan wanted to speak in his budget vote some of the EFF members continuously
interrupted him. When the chairperson ordered them to leave the chamber, first
one and then a number of the MPs got up and walked up to the podium where
Minister Gordhan was standing. They stood centimetres away from him until the
parliamentary security eventually evicted them.
It was the most
brazen act of bullying and intimidation I had ever seen, in or outside of Parliament.
Interestingly it was the members of the opposition (including Natasha Mazzone),
who first jumped up to protect Gordhan.
Afterwards Julius Malema
triumphantly declared that "When Pravin appears in
Parliament, we will repeat what we did before, and I will unashamedly be
leading the #44Battalion from the front." He did not stop there. "He defends the white status quo, he is an infiltration in the struggle of the
emancipation of our people. He was deployed to derail the liberation movement
and when this was achieved, he remained to safeguard the interest of the white
on Gordhan is so ridiculous that it is actually boring. The problem is that
many young followers of Malema seem to believe in these outrageous and
intellectually lazy utterances. Thus it is now fashionable to have placards at
rallies with the words: "Gordhan, where were you during apartheid?"
record: Pravin Gordhan was an anti-apartheid activist from a very young age. Already
as a young student at university he got into trouble for his beliefs and early
in the 1980s was detained by the apartheid police. He spent much of
his early 20s in detention. In 1981 he was held in solitary confinement for 160
days. According to friends close to him, he was severely tortured during this
time. Gordhan went underground in 1986 before being arrested once more in 1990.
He was released a year later to participate in negotiations which led to South
EFF members, I have worked with Pravin for many years post 1994. Like all of
us, he has made his mistakes, but I can assure you that
one of them has certainly not been to protect or defend white interests.
To suggest that is truly laughable.
this is not a piece primarily about Pravin Gordhan or about the legal intricacies
of the so-called rogue unit. What really concerns me, is what the EFF is doing to
democracy and specifically to Parliament.
institution Parliament has rules – as required by the Constitution – to ensure
that this crucial institution can function properly and fairly. After the
incident last week, I had another look at the rules. I counted at least 10
rules that the members of the EFF broke on the day.
example: rule 69 states that members may not engage in grossly disorderly conduct in the House and its
forums, including — (a) deliberately creating serious disorder or disruption;
(b) in any manner whatsoever physically intervening, preventing, obstructing or
hindering the removal of a member from the House who has been ordered to leave
the House; (c) repeatedly undermining the authority of the presiding officer or
repeatedly refusing to obey rulings of the presiding officer or repeatedly
disrespecting and interrupting the presiding officer while the latter is
addressing the House; (d) persisting in making serious allegations against a
member without adequate substantiation or following the correct procedure; (e)
using or threatening violence against a member or other person; or (f) acting
in any other way to the serious detriment of the dignity, decorum or orderly
procedure of the House.
were in breach of every section of rule 69. I believe a case can be made that
they also broke rules 64, 66, 70, 84 and 85.
to act immediately and decisively. This cannot continue.
The rules state
that once someone has been removed from the House they are automatically
suspended and may not come into the chamber or precinct of Parliament for the
duration of the suspension. The first time this happens the suspension applies
for five parliamentary working days, the second 10 days and thereafter 20 days
per occasion. My understanding is that they also lose their salaries during
The question is
whether Parliament is actually applying this rule. After the incident with
Gordhan last week one of the evicted EFF members was back in the chamber during
another debate less than 30 minutes later.
salaries are deducted, one would think that MPs would be less eager to
misbehave continuously. If indeed they don't care, then Parliament should
change the rules and institute harsher penalties.
Surely, as with
any institution, abiding by the rules should be a precondition of membership.
So perhaps it is time to change the law so that once MPs have broken too many rules, too many times,
they lose their seats and cannot come back.
I'm sure some
people will say that would be going too far. However, when one of the most
basic provisions of the Constitution, i.e. freedom of speech, is repeatedly
denied to ministers or other members of Parliament, something has to be done to
prevent total anarchy by a group of people who are misusing their parliamentary
positions to intimidate and bully someone they simply don't like.
- Melanie Verwoerd is a former ANC MP and South African Ambassador to Ireland.
** Want to respond to the columnist? Send your letter or article to firstname.lastname@example.org with your name, profile picture, contact details and location. We encourage a diversity of voices and views in our readers' submissions and reserve the right not to publish any and all submissions received.
Disclaimer: News24 encourages freedom of speech and the expression of diverse views. The views of columnists published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24.
Volkswagen‘s double cab, the Amarok, is now available in a special edition.
Craig Anderson a lecturer in Statistics answers how likely this is to happen.
You don't even have to break the bank to enjoy a friction-free summer.
Here's how the five best-paid Formula 1 drivers in 2019 justify their earnings.
In case you’re having a bad day.
Automobili Lamborghini celebrated Monterey Car Week with an array of supercars.
The island of Curaçao!
An authentic display of gravitas and empathy.
Cape TownTracking Talent
Cape TownAmazon Development Centre SA (Pty) Ltd
Cape TownFinovate People
R 2 600 000
R 2 995 000
We subscribe to the Press Code.
You choose what you want
News24 on Android
Get the latest from News24 on your Android device.
Terms and Conditions
24.com Terms and Conditions - Updated April 2012
Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.
This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.