Simon Williamson

Clinton eyeing 2016, surely

2013-08-16 07:55

Simon Williamson

I am aware the next US presidential election is three and a half years away, and that any speculation now can change in that time.

But the personality and prospective candidacy of Hillary Clinton is hard to ignore, especially as two events this week seem electorally significant. The first was an interview with clownish New York City Democratic candidate for mayor Anthony Weiner, husband of Hillary confidante Huma Abedin. During the interview, Buzzfeed's Ben Smith asked Weiner, "Do you know what [Abedin's] role in Hillary's 2016 campaign is going to be?"

"I do," replied Weiner.

"What will it be?" pressed Smith.

Weiner: "I'm not telling you."

Abedin is likely the closest person to Hillary Clinton who isn't an immediate relative. If anyone knows what is potting in 2016 it is she.

And although Team Hillary rubbished the tsunami of speculation elicited by this Weiner comment, it is yet another piece of the jigsaw that points to Clinton obviously running in the next presidential election.

Staying relevant

The other signal dropped this last week was a speech Clinton made in San Francisco on Monday, where she blasted the decision by the Supreme Court earlier this year to strike down a major part of the Civil Rights-era Voting Rights Act, which specifically protected the right of black people to vote in parts of the country where they faced blatant and legislated discrimination.

Now, why would Clinton be making such remarks? Of course she probably agrees with the sentiment of her speech, but this also had the added benefits of keeping her in a relevant news cycle, as well as firming up support of a key Democratic constituency she will need for both the party primary and general election.

It's also an indication Clinton won't be beaten on her left flank like in 2008, where she looked to be the de facto nominee until a young Chicago senator with an odd name won huge liberal and African-American support. While making sure she is publicly on the side of the voting rights of poor and minority voters - currently a hot topic in the US - she has also declared her support for gay marriage, and will be making another speech in Philadelphia about national security policies next month - you can read that as commenting on the Edward-Snowden-National-Security-Agency-government-spying fracas.

The most notorious advantage Barack Obama had in 2008 over Clinton - her vote for the Iraq War - will be somewhat mitigated by it ending while she was Secretary of State, and being another eight years further back in history. The niche carved out for a populist campaign such as the one Obama ran after eight years of George W Bush is also yet to show it is going to open up - likely largely due to Obama's inability to follow up on his populist message five years ago. Certainly none of the names being thrown around as possible Democratic contenders against Clinton - Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo or Vice President Joe Biden- have track records suggesting a populist campaign is a realistic adventure. (The odd publication is throwing the name of uber-liberal Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren around but her capacity to win a general election is limited.)

Phenomenal polling

When contrasted with those names, it is patently obvious why Clinton is likely to run: she is even more likely to win the nomination in 2016 than she was in 2008. Her polling is simply phenomenal, and the liberal wing of the Democratic Party seems to be in her corner this time around.

This is no indication of general election success - in spite of polling showing she is competitive in states like Louisiana, I'd be very surprised if a state like that remains within grasp of an establishment Democrat after a full campaign cycle. Republicans also have a formidable list of possible candidates, and Clinton may not be properly tested or vetted in a competitive Democratic primary if other candidates cower in fear and decide not to run.

As I mentioned earlier, this could all change in the next three years, which, in politics, is the Cretaceous Period. But there is ample reason to believe Clinton is making moves try and make sure it doesn’t.

- Simon Williamson is a freelance writer. Follow @simonwillo on Twitter.

Send your comments to Simon

Disclaimer: News24 encourages freedom of speech and the expression of diverse views. The views of columnists published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24.

Read more on:    anthony weiner  |  hillary clinton  |  barack obama

SHARE: publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.