Trends, change and recovery: SA beyond Covid-19 is an attempt at sourcing a range of theories.
Light rain. More sun than clouds. Cool.
The New York Times published an editorial on Thursday, along with The Guardian calling for Edward Snowden – the man who exposed the US government’s spy
programmes in use on its own citizens – to receive clemency.
re-ignited the perpetual debate as to whether Snowden is a hero, a traitor, a
patriot, a whistle-blower or some attention-seeker who likes to get his jollies
Of all the things Americans take
seriously – guns, food portions, war etc – none of them trump the Constitution.
And it is a pretty good constitution, which places severe limits on what the
government can and cannot do. T
hroughout history, lawmakers (sometimes aided by
the courts) have chipped away at some of the major parts, in this instance the
Fourth Amendment. Just as an aside: the first ten amendments to the US
Constitution are considered the country’s Bill of Rights.
Amendment number four says this
(emphasis mine): “The right of the people to be secure in their persons,
houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,
shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,
supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to
be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
That’s not some recommendation: that
is a principle document under which the United States must function. In
relation to what we are talking about here: if the US government or any of its
law enforcement agencies wish to search you, it should require a specific
warrant (where is it permitting searching, and what law enforcement is looking
for) with a reasonable justification for wanting to do so – it can’t just point
fingers willy-nilly and decide to go and have a squiz.
What Snowden exposed to the world is
that the US government – under the useful guise of warding off terrorism – was
maintaining records of phone calls made in the US.
Not the content, mind you,
but what it termed “metadata” – the time of the call, what number called what
number, how long they were on the call for, where the callers were, and that
sort of thing.
That may initially sound somewhat
innocuous, considering the US government wasn’t listening to the contents of
conversations, but consider this: the governing administration, not all that
long ago, caught a hissy-fit over an article in the Associated Press (AP) which
involved leaked information about a foiled terrorist plot in Yemen.
attempt to investigate the source of the leak, it secretly got itself two
months of phone records for 21 landlines in five AP offices, five reporters’
cellular phones, three home phones and two fax lines.
In other words, anyone who took information to the AP within that two-month
period now has records of his or her phone calls in the government’s hands.
Read another way: people with information on government’s wrongdoings are now
less likely to expose it for fear of having the department of justice come
after them; pure and simple intimidation.
It isn’t the most difficult thing in
the world to put pieces of your life together if who you speak to, how often
you speak to them, and from where you speak to them (and where they happen to
be) is all known.
And that was merely the beginning.
The next level of stories that broke detailed how government was also vacuuming
up internet data – what sites people had visited, and for how long.
A mere few seconds
of thinking is all you need to consider just what power that puts in the hands
of whoever has it, particular an entity with an agenda like government, and how
there is no way that sort of policy can be congruent with the Fourth Amendment
to the US Constitution.
And just how government gave itself
this authority to defecate all over the Fourth Amendment also came to light
while the Snowden revelations played out: a secret court – to which the
government is the only party – decides whether to dish out warrants on this
sort of surveillance or not, under broadly-defined laws, the infamous Patriot
Act, and reauthorisations of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
hardly ever says no. Secrecy litters itself throughout this process – in fact the department of justice was under no obligation to tell the AP it was hoovering
up all its phone records. Do you know what kinds of laws and court decisions
you can’t challenge? Secret ones.
So Edward Snowden exposed the
government intentionally ignoring the Constitution, spying in its own citizens,
seeing where they go on the internet, and how it gives itself the power to do
so in secret.
While there is absolutely no chance
the Obama administration will let Snowden off the hook – it went after Chelsea
Manning (previously Bradley Manning, Chelsea now lives as a woman) in venomous
fashion – there should be no doubt that what Snowden did was in the US’
There shouldn’t even be a debate as
to whether Snowden deserves a plea bargain – something the New York Times
He should receive an immediate pardon from the US
government, and thanks from an American public. None of it in secret.
Disclaimer: News24 encourages freedom of speech and the
expression of diverse views. The views of columnists published on
News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the
views of News24.
24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.
'It’s great to see it resonate with so many people.'
Mazda had an early rugged SUV in the 1990s
'I need a man who will not run from conflict.'
4 professional skin care brands share how they've adapted.
Will back-to-school fall into the same miscommunication of open-toe shoes?
Readers respond to Jeep Gladiator's SA debut.
"We are destitute, parents are desperate and children are frustrated."
SwellendamPetrus Swart Landboudienste (Pty) Ltd
Cape TownTumaini ConsultingR500 000.00 - R600 000.00 Per Year
Cape TownHire ResolveR650 000.00 - R750 000.00 Per Year
Apartments / Flats
R 9 850 000
Apartments / Flats
R 2 575 000
R 2 700 000
News24 subscribes to The South African Press Code that prescribes news that is truthful, accurate, fair and balanced.
You choose what you want
News24 on Android
Get the latest from News24 on your Android device.
Terms and Conditions
24.com Terms and Conditions - Updated April 2012
Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.
This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.