Obama climate steps temperate

2013-01-23 21:44
A UN report has showed that the effects of climate change may be unavoidable. (Duncan Alfreds, News24)

A UN report has showed that the effects of climate change may be unavoidable. (Duncan Alfreds, News24)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Washington – The Obama administration is likely to rely mostly on existing rules and on flexing executive power to execute its second-term environmental agenda, sidestepping Congress as it sets about radically reducing greenhouse gases generated by major polluters.

Just a day after President Barack Obama said in his inaugural address that for the United States not to respond to the threat of climate change would "betray our children and future generations," White House spokesperson Jay Carney tamped down expectations for bold new moves.

Carney declined to define specific policies, suggesting the White House will expand its current strategy to regulate and reduce carbon emissions.

"The president will build on, when it comes to climate change, the progress that was achieved in his first term," Carney said at a press briefing.

More details on climate initiatives could come out of the president's State of the Union address on 12 February.

Environmentalists have judged Obama as too timid in his first term, especially after a congressional stalemate ended legislative efforts.

The White House has pointed to its drafting of emissions standards for the construction of new power plants and, along with the car industry, setting stringent fuel efficiency standards for new cars.

The United States is undergoing a boom in domestic energy production, from the oilfields of North Dakota to hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, that has unlocked massive gas reserves in several states. Taking strong environmental steps while still supporting aggressive drilling and exploration will be a balancing act.

Fracking is a mixed blessing, prompting local protests over concerns about possible water pollution but also lowering emissions by displacing coal at power plants.

Clean air clout 

Obama is expected to name an entirely new energy policy team in the next few weeks. Environmental Protection Agency administrator Lisa Jackson and Interior Secretary Ken Salazar are departing. Secretary of Energy Steven Chu is widely expected to leave soon.

Carol Browner, Obama's former White House climate and energy czar, said whoever steps in for Jackson and the others would be following a "path that has already been charted by the president.

"I think it's an agenda that has been set under presidential leadership and I think that will continue," Browner said.

Climate analysts guess that the EPA could soon announce a move to use its authority under the federal Clean Air Act to regulate heat-trapping greenhouse gases.

By April the agency is expected to complete carbon emission standards for building new power plants that would effectively prevent any new coal-fired facilities from being built. Next would come a more controversial effort, setting standards for existing coal-fired plants, which account for 40% of US greenhouse gases. The measure is sure to provoke industry lawsuits.

"The most likely area for the administration to pursue, in light of what the president said, would be using the New Source Performance Standard (NSPS) for existing power plants under the Clean Air Act," Dina Kruger, a former director of the Climate Change Division at the EPA said.

The NSPS is a programme under the Clean Air Act that sets a limit on the rate at which a facility can emit using the best available emission controls.

The EPA is required to produce greenhouse gas standards for existing sources following a 2010 settlement with environmental groups and some states. It has not yet set a deadline.

Ed Whitfield, chair of the House subcommittee on energy and environment, told reporters that Republicans would not be able to curb legislatively any rules the EPA proposes.

Recent court decisions that have touched on the legal basis for the EPA to regulate carbon have mostly come down in its favor.

David Doniger, policy director of the Natural Resources Defense Council's Climate and Clean Air Programme, said this could embolden the EPA as it tackles rules that may be more aggressive than those rolled out under Jackson.

Green groups and certain states may sue the EPA to force it to regulate carbon and other greenhouse gas emissions from other unregulated sources such as oil refineries and methane released by fracking.

While the agency is used to being sued by both green and industry groups, the number of cases is apt to increase.

Kruger said the EPA would be wise to prioritize just a handful of new rules to tackle as it faces a constrained budget in the coming years.

Browner, who was Clinton's EPA administrator, said Obama could use executive orders to direct vast federal agencies to adopt measures that could limit their own energy use, a significant reduction of emissions.

A 2009 executive order required federal agencies to develop and implement sustainable energy plans and review them annually to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, energy, water and waste.

The Department of Energy has issued 16 new or updated energy efficiency standards for home appliances, commercial buildings and industrial facilities that would reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 6.5bn tons - the equivalent of taking 1.4bn cars off the road for a year - by 2030.

Agencies with heavy carbon footprints, such as the Department of Defence, have launched a number of initiatives, such as buying a fleet of electric vehicles and investing in renewable energy.

But market forces more than regulations could have the biggest impact on carbon emissions in the coming years, with cleaner natural gas from fracking continuing to displace coal as a source of electricity.

"When it comes to carbon, the market has actually done a lot of things that you would hope policy would do. I don't think you need a whole lot of policy to increase gas use [to replace coal] in power generation," said Nikos Tsafos, analyst at PFC Energy in Washington.

Read more on:    barack obama  |  us  |  environment

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.