Study: BP oil spill damaged sea-floor life

2013-09-26 07:26
(Picture: AP)

(Picture: AP)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

New Orleans - The vast 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill damaged the tiny animals that live on the sea floor for about 147km² around the blown-out BP oil well, with severe damage in about 23km² of that area, a Texas A&M researcher says.

Pollution and damage to animal life was severe nearly 3km from the wellhead and identifiable more than 16km away, Paul Montagna wrote in a report published on Tuesday in the online journal PLOS One.

Montagna, a professor of ecosystems and modelling, said the refrigerator-cold water 1.6km beneath the surface means oil takes longer to decay than in shallower waters, where spill recovery has taken years to decades. That means full recovery could take a generation or more, he said in an interview.

"This is the first large-scale examination of the impact on the soft bottom, which is the largest habitat in deep water," said Robert Carney, a deep-sea ecologist and professor in Louisiana State University's department of oceanography and coastal sciences. Carney, who was not part of this study, said that it was well done.

He said he wasn't surprised by the extent of the damage, given the size and reach of the plume of oil. BP's Macondo well blew wild for nearly three months starting on 20 April 2010, when an explosion on the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig killed 11 workers.

BP scepticism

"The plume... drifted all over the place," so oil that became heavy enough to sink could cover a large area, Carney said.

The study is part of the Natural Resource Damage Assessment that will help decide what damages BP must pay. Montagna said he expects to be subpoenaed as part of the litigation spawned by the oil spill, since he was working for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and with NOAA scientists.

BP issued a statement expressing scepticism about some details of the report.

"The paper provides no data to support a claim that it could take decades for these deep sea species to recover. In fact, the researchers acknowledge that little is known about recovery rates of these communities following an event such as this," BP said.

It said the paper "confirms that potential injury to the deep sea soft sediment ecosystem was limited to a small area in the immediate vicinity of the Macondo well-head" first identified in December 2010.

Because it was the nation's first deep-sea spill, "we're in uncharted territory", said Montagna, who took sea bottom cores in September and October 2010, looking for oil. The well had been capped July 15, but cleanup and other vessels kept the survey boats from checking some spots where they wanted samples, Montagna said.

"What was astounding was we found effects out to many, many miles," Montagna said.

He said he was surprised in spite of the extent of the spill, which closed about 227 900km² of federal waters to fishing.

"When the spill started, we were saying, 'Oil floats. There won't be effects on the deep sea or bottom.' Obviously that wasn't true," he said.

Statistical analysis

The scientists analysed core samples from 68 sites between 500m and nearly 125km from the Macondo wellhead, looking for animal life and for pollutants such as the toxic oil components called polyaromatic hydrocarbons and heavy metals such as barium from drilling mud used in unsuccessful attempts to shut the well.

Statistical analysis reduced it to one number - an index of high contamination and low biological diversity - used to map the effects.

The analysis took so much time because one step was counting and classifying small animals and comparing the numbers of nematode worms and the tiny crustaceans called copepods, which are more sensitive to pollution. That is still going on for samples from a follow-up cruise in spring 2011 and hasn't even begun for 102 of the sites checked in 2010, Montagna said.

The team hopes for a spring 2014 cruise, he said.

Carney said "the neatest thing" is that the information is public.

"One of the frustrations for people who are trying to find out what has happened in the Gulf is the legal necessity of the secrecy of the NRDA data. To have this come out so it can get scientific review is great."
Read more on:    bp  |  us  |  environment  |  us oil slick

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.
NEXT ON NEWS24X publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.