PLEASE NOTE:

MyNews24 is a user-generated section of News24.com. The stories here come from users.

 
Dave James Colquhoun
 
Comments: 3
Article views: 4
 
 
Latest Badges:

 
View all Dave James Colquhoun's badges.
 

Dear Mr Mona

14 February 2014, 05:30

I am seeking some clarity on several issues surrounding the E-Tolls and I don’t mean to sound like an ignoramus, but I am genuinely confused here.

First point that I would like to raise is the debate about whether or not the E-Tolling system is a tax. According to my understanding here, it might be but the fact that SANRAL charges VAT on the transactions would indicate that I might be wrong.

I saw your comments at the beginning of February, you have stated that the E-Toll is NOT a tax but rather the VAT is being charged because of the services offered by SANRAL. If I understand this whole set up correctly, SANRAL is a wholly Government owned entity where the Government is the sole shareholder. SANRAL receives a slice of the budget pie just like the Department of education does and this slice of the budget pie comes directly from the taxation structures in South Africa.

So if I understand this correctly, the Government taxes me and everyone else to pay for certain infrastructure including the roads etc. SANRAL then gets this money and supposedly uses this for the roads and road infrastructure maintenance. Therefore I think that the E-Toll is another tax as the money also goes to SANRAL for the same purpose.

How can you say that SANRAL is a non-profit organisation if it receives considerable funding from the Government by means of taxation. This means that VAT cannot be applied as this is already a tax and it is outrageous for someone to have to pay a tax on a tax.

OK, let’s assume that E-Tolls are not another form of taxation as you have stated and let’s pretend that SANRAL is a privately owned corporate entity that has been contracted to build, maintain and provide certain services related to the road infrastructure. I know that this isn’t true as my tax money has already been paid to set up this dummy corporation but let’s assume that this is a privately owned entity outside of Government (even though it isn’t).

So now you want us to believe that you are offering us a service? Hang on a second, I never wanted to use your product but you have now forced me to use your “service” as I have to go that way to earn my living. Then you told us that we have 7 days to pay for using your product which now means that you are extending credit to me. Credit which I haven’t asked for and which I cannot afford.

I don’t recall filling in any papers or agreeing to any credit and I think I would remember this especially it if someone had explained the ludicrous terms and conditions and the consequences of defaulting on this credit to me. As far as I know, and please correct me if I’m wrong, when a financially certified institution like a bank or a retailer offers a person credit, then the onus is on them to have the creditworthiness evaluated before they will grant the credit. Did you forget about this somewhere in your haste to fill your corrupt little paws with as much of our money as you could?

Now, assuming that you are providing a service (for which we are paying) could you explain the billing part of this to me. According to my calculations, you are adding in excess of 500% “interest” for late payment after 7 days. Imagine if your bank did that to you. I’m pretty sure that the courts would never allow any other financial institution to get away with this.

I thought that the in duplum rule would also have applied here and that you could only sue me for a maximum amount of twice the value of the original debt. After all, you are supposedly (by your own statements) only providing a service. Surely, the Consumer Protection Act was promulgated to deal with these types of credit agreement

You then go on to say that we am going to be arrested and that I go to jail if I don’t pay for this service that I didn’t ask for. I always thought that defaulting on a credit agreement (which neither of us have here) meant that you would be blacklisted and prevented from getting any further credit and then some of my hard earned possessions could be sold off to cover the debt.

I also see that you haven’t made any attempts to stop me from accessing any “credit” with your organisation so therefore I have to assume that you have investigated my financial circumstances and confirmed that I can afford this like every other legitimate financial service provider has to do.

So tell me Mr Mona, are we being taxed for things that we have already paid for and then taxed again (VAT) for that tax or are we being treated as consumers with rights here?

Disclaimer: All articles and letters published on MyNews24 have been independently written by members of News24's community. The views of users published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24. News24 editors also reserve the right to edit or delete any and all comments received.

 

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
3 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.

Read more from our Users

Submitted by
maseratifittipaldi
Reply to the Nelson Mandela Found...

Yes, there is no question about it. We need radical change. Social justice. But what are the ills we see? What are the solutions?  Read more...

0 comments 570 views
Submitted by
Chili Nel
ANC Adieu

A clearly debilitated ANC is limping along to 16 December, hoping for a miracle cure; something that would heal the suppurating sores on it’s mangy coat and save it from decaying into oblivion. Read more...

0 comments 619 views
Submitted by
Sean Parker
Which car would you max on this r...

If given the opportunity to reach the top speed of any car on an airfield, which set of wheels would you choose to go blisteringly quick in a straight line? Read more...

0 comments 4716 views
Submitted by
MikeHampton
Third force behind The President'...

Politics is a knife that cuts into the Public every which way it can. Politics is the sociopath, the Public its willing victim. The Public needs to demand better instead of praising sensationalism, gossip and bias over logic and truth. Read more...

0 comments 2139 views
Submitted by
Robyn Boake
Once the pride of CT, the MyCiti ...

Up until recently it was a service that Capetonians were proud of, a service bragged about as an example of what could be achieved as a solution for the masses. But that all changed. Read more...

0 comments 1671 views
Submitted by
Jan Badenhorst
Matric results in less than a mon...

The matric results for the 2017 matric class will be available to students at their schools, in the newspapers and online, on 5 January 2018. Read more...

0 comments 775 views
 

services

RSS feeds News delivered really simply.

E-mail Newsletters You choose what you want

News24 on Android Get the latest from News24 on your Android device.

SMS Alerts Get breaking news stories via SMS.

 
Interactive Advertising Bureau
 
© 2017 24.com. All rights reserved.
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.