THE unanimous judgment handed down by the Constitutional Court has ended an inordinately costly two-year process of back and forth in which the ruling party sought to use its parliamentary majority to protect the patently unlawful actions of its president.
In light of this judgment and the statement of the Constitutional Court that the president has acted illegally, the only rational response from the ANC would be to ask the president of South Africa to step down.
Reacting to the judgment, as chief whip of the Inkatha Freedom Party, I said: “The chief justice has given us cause for hope this morning. The judgment of the Constitutional Court is more far-reaching than many of the experts thought it would be, and for that we are grateful.
“In the very first meeting of the parliamentary ad hoc committee on security upgrades at Nkandla — in 2014 — I stood on behalf of the IFP and asked the committee to apply for a declaratory order from the Constitutional Court to pronounce on ‘the binding nature of remedial action recommended by the public protector’. But the predominantly ANC committee refused.”
A declaratory order is not an unusual step. It is being done by the Electoral Commission on the question of determining voters’ residential addresses.
The failure to seek such an order from the Constitutional Court led to the inordinate delay in finalising this damaging matter, and has taken a toll on our citizens’ respect for the president, Parliament and elected public representatives.
I said: “From the start I warned the ANC that they could use their parliamentary majority to subvert the process and protect the president, unlawfully absolving him from having to comply with the public protector’s report, but in the end it would not work.”
The IFP commends the Constitutional Court on ensuring that constitutional democracy prevails. The IFP always indicated that it would participate in parliamentary processes “without prejudice”, and our underlying call was that the president must respect and comply with the report of the public protector.
Damage has been done to our country’s reputation and to the integrity of the president. It will only be corrected once the president pays what is due to the fiscus. That, however, cannot be the end. He should then do the honourable thing and resign, failing which, his own party must recall him.
NAREND SINGH MP
Chief whip of the IFP