MyNews24 is a user-generated section of The stories here come from users.

Jolanda Andrag
Comments: 3
Article views: 764
Latest Badges:

View all Jolanda Andrag's badges.

SA needs to give whistle blowers the freedom and protection they need!

24 March 2014, 11:44

This year we are celebrating 20 years of democracy. We celebrate a constitution based on freedom, equality en transparency. We celebrate every positive change that came to be. Yet, we can’t deny the threat of the purposed Protection of State Information Bill in the current South African context. Transparency International places South Africa, 72nd out of 177 countries in their Corruption Perception Index of 2013. In 2001 we were placed 38th. Thus, we fell 34 places. 88% of South Africans believe that the police is corrupt and a further 36% admits that they have bribed a police officer. In the 2011/2012 financial year the South African Police Service (SAPS) spent R20.5 billion on civil pay-outs. Research also shows that 88% of public officials accused of fraud and/or corruption are guilty. Taking into account the unsolved Weapon scandal, Gupta-saga and the Nkandla debacle, it seems that people’s perceptions is reflecting the reality and then the state argues they want to protect us against so called hostile activities.

To unlock this debate we need to ask what the purpose of this legislation is, what the role of the state currently is and what it will become if this law is implemented. We also need to question the ability to classify state information given the public sectors reputation. Besides the matter of international guidelines, this can be a threat to the values people fought for during the apartheid era. First one must look at the role of the state.

The State as institution is created by the people and must govern for the people. In South Africa we strive towards a state as an extension of society. In line with the social contract, the state is there to enforce law and order, deliver services and to act as an intermediary between individuals and their goals. The state also extends itself to the judiciary system, nationalized industries and regulating the economy. According to Chapter 3 of the Constitution the state must work together in good faith and mutual trust by informing one another of, and consulting one another on, matters of common interest. Thus, one can argue that in terms of access to information the state and society must be a unit. This excludes information that is a direct threat to national security. The state governs on behalf of society, therefore it is only right that the state keeps society informed.

According to the Department of Government Communication and Information System, the purpose of the proposed so called secrecy bill is to “address the rising threat of espionage and hostile activities, the selling of information and the protection of critical databases in government, without impeding the constitutional rights of citizens to access information.

It will create a system for classification and declassification of information held by the State. In addition, it will protect valuable information while at the same time not inhibiting the free flow of ideas and information.” They further state they want to protect citizens from fear. Before we comment on the latter, let us compare the bill to international guidelines.

Article 19 of the United Nations’ International Guidelines address freedom of speech and the disclosure of information states the following:

Principle 15: No person may be punished on national security grounds for disclosure of information if (1) the disclosure does not actually harm and is not likely to harm a legitimate national security interest, or (2) the public interest in knowing the information outweighs the harm from disclosure;

Principle 16:“[n]o person may be subjected to any detriment on national security grounds for disclosing information that he or she learned by virtue of government service if the public interest in knowing the information outweighs the harm from disclosure”.

Principal 18: “[p]rotection of national security may not be used as a reason to compel a journalist to reveal a confidential source”.

Ironically enough, these principles are called “The Johannesburg Principles on National Security, Freedom of Expression and Access to Information”. After law experts agreed on these principles at the Wits University in 1995, the UN endorsed it every following year as the official guidelines concerning the matter. These principles do not reflect in the purposed bill. The bill only makes room for citizens to request information to be declassified, but the media argue they don’t have any guarantee, because the court needs to use the broad definition of National security as stated in the bill. Yes, it is a security bill and not a media bill, but it confines the media in such a way that the latter can’t fulfil their role effectively. Government and every state official must be held accountable for their actions. This can only happen when the public not only have access to information, but also receives the necessary protection. That said, when a whistle blower suspects something, gets access to information which can be a threat to national security and nothing unlawful is found, whistle blowers must take into account that they can be prosecuted if they distributed this information.

The above is a risk, but it is a risk we need to take. Given the current situation, where we have a dominant political party system, where the line between state and government is vague, a state and a security sector with a questionable reputation and the context of what the state’s constitutional mandate is and the international prescribed guidelines, we need to give whistle blowers the freedom and protection they need. At this stage in time it is our best option. The Independent Classification Review Panel is a good idea, but it is initiated by a state that doesn’t recall integrity.

The state needs to keep their constitutional mandate in mind when the propose legislation like the above mentioned. Furthermore, international guidelines are there for a reason. It is always a good idea to advise them, especially in the light that most Western countries have had decades to test these bills and thus knows what is effective. South Africans should decide what role they want the state to fulfil. One must realize the state is accountable to you, and therefore one must not allow the state to decide which information is to be made public. For this bill to be accepted, the state’s security establishments need to work a lot on their reputation, because it doesn’t invoke any trust to work with information that could promote accountability. Therefore, at this point in time, the proposed Protection of State Information legislation won’t work.

Disclaimer: All articles and letters published on MyNews24 have been independently written by members of News24's community. The views of users published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24. News24 editors also reserve the right to edit or delete any and all comments received. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Read more from our Users

Submitted by
Reply to the Nelson Mandela Found...

Yes, there is no question about it. We need radical change. Social justice. But what are the ills we see? What are the solutions?  Read more...

0 comments 283 views
Submitted by
Chili Nel
ANC Adieu

A clearly debilitated ANC is limping along to 16 December, hoping for a miracle cure; something that would heal the suppurating sores on it’s mangy coat and save it from decaying into oblivion. Read more...

0 comments 356 views
Submitted by
Sean Parker
Which car would you max on this r...

If given the opportunity to reach the top speed of any car on an airfield, which set of wheels would you choose to go blisteringly quick in a straight line? Read more...

0 comments 4639 views
Submitted by
Third force behind The President'...

Politics is a knife that cuts into the Public every which way it can. Politics is the sociopath, the Public its willing victim. The Public needs to demand better instead of praising sensationalism, gossip and bias over logic and truth. Read more...

0 comments 1826 views
Submitted by
Palestinians have nothing to gain...

Palestinian political unity is the biggest threat to the occupation. And demanding that Hamas disarm is the biggest threat to the unity agreement between Palestinian factions. Read more...

0 comments 176 views
Submitted by
Robyn Boake
Once the pride of CT, the MyCiti ...

Up until recently it was a service that Capetonians were proud of, a service bragged about as an example of what could be achieved as a solution for the masses. But that all changed. Read more...

0 comments 1311 views


RSS feeds News delivered really simply.

E-mail Newsletters You choose what you want

News24 on Android Get the latest from News24 on your Android device.

SMS Alerts Get breaking news stories via SMS.

Interactive Advertising Bureau
© 2017 All rights reserved.
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.