MyNews24 is a user-generated section of The stories here come from users.

Comments: 3
Article views: 979
Latest Badges:

View all cvh23's badges.

The absurd contradictions of affirmative action

18 June 2014, 07:33

Whether we like it or not, or whether our present was envisioned like this or not, as South Africans we still identify with race as strongly as ever. We are far from being a colour blind society.

It is commonly accepted that we need to redress the imbalances of the past and increase diversity (‘diversity’ itself seems to be an overused word – do we still know what it really means?) in many aspects of life. And this is currently being done in a number of ways. From employment equity regulations requiring that the employment preference be given to individuals from the designated groups, to university entrance preference being given to people previously discriminated against. But does affirmative action policies have the intended consequences?

Affirmative action policies benefit educated black people with experience and education, as they are more likely to get a particular job than a competing white person. But on the other end of the scale, the employer is taking a bigger risk in hiring a person without a track record from a designated group for a low-income job, because if that person fails to perform it is legally more difficult to fire that person due to legislation. Because of this a qualified black professional is likely to earn more than an equally qualified white professional, whereas on the other side, an unqualified black person working an entry level job will probably be paid the same or even less than a white person doing the same job.

What about the economic consequences? Does affirmative action benefit all previously disadvantaged people?

The only way poor South Africans can be lifted out of poverty in a meaningful, long term way is through growth and development of the economy (welfare or nationalization (confiscation) of private property won’t produce meaningful, long term benefits). Economic productivity will create growth in terms of job opportunities and business opportunities. This seems simplistic, but it is true. This means having a free market where people can pursue their interests without restrictive regulations, or excessive taxes. Affirmative action regulations can often prevent the people best suited for a particular position from working in that position. If you have the best people in a particular job they can achieve more, and produce wealth at a greater rate than someone not as competent who were put in the position for political reasons. If we have more rapid economic development and growth, a wider range and a larger number of people can enter the middle class from a position of poverty, as there will be more employment and investment.

Apart from the abovementioned economic effects, the social effects should also be considered. Does the lower standards of achievement required of previously disadvantaged people create independence? Does affirmative action policies not simply serve to subsidize lower standards of performance? Whether it is university entry requirements, or workplace quotas, previously disadvantaged people do have an advantage (this is not to say that other people didn’t have an unfair advantage in the past). These policies create dependence and complacency. What if these policies were to ever end? Previously disadvantaged people will have become used to these lower standards, and will have to make a sudden adjustment to fit into a new, more open system.

An interesting comparison can be made to the United States’ affirmative action policies starting in the mid 60's. Despite decades of affirmative action policies, the income gap between black and white has remained constant, and if anything, many black people are worse off today. The rate of black children being born to single mothers has increased disproportionately compared to whites, as has the prison incarceration rate for African Americans. The proportion of black people on welfare has also increased disproportionately. Welfare creates dependence on the state as it discourages voluntary self-improvement. Research shows that once most people who start receiving welfare, they never stop receiving welfare, i.e. they never become productive in their own right. It is interesting how the Democratic Party in America is seen as the progressives leading the way in promoting minority rights (in the US, black people are a minority). Planned Parenthood (a government reproductive health organization), a democrat initiative, conducts nearly half of all abortions in America (300 000 of roughly 800 000 in 2010). Planned Parenthood’s clinics are predominantly found in minority communities, with a disproportionately high number of abortions being conducted on black women. Depending on your view on abortion, this could be considered genocidal. Very few people know that the Ku Klux Klan was also closely linked to the Democratic Party. It is the Democratic Party that initiated affirmative action in the US through president Johnson, although the Republicans helped to keep it alive. As such it is likely that affirmative action and welfare policies have had undesirable social consequences for those it was intended to benefit.

This is not to say that previously disadvantaged people can’t achieve success in their own right (as proponents of these policies seem to imply). Affirmative Action only seems to benefit those looking to enter tertiary education, or enter the work force, it does not benefit previously disadvantaged people on the whole. Affirmative action has only really benefitted people who probably didn’t need affirmative action in the first place. Affirmative action at best only redistribute jobs, it does not create new ones, meaning there is no net benefit to society.

People in our society seem to be obsessed with the word ‘equality’. Where does the word ‘equality’ come from? It’s original meaning was meant as “equality before God”, not equality in wealth, abilities or even happiness. True equality in a modern sense ought to mean ‘equal opportunity’. The best we can do is to treat people equally. We cannot make them equal.

But this is the pragmatic view of why affirmative action doesn’t work. Then of course there is the principle of the matter, where one can ask whether a system like this is fair or if it is morally justifiable?

It is said you can’t achieve good ends through bad means. Maybe it is necessary to reassess affirmative action policies and to remember that government policies should not be judged by their intentions, but by their outcomes.

Disclaimer: All articles and letters published on MyNews24 have been independently written by members of News24's community. The views of users published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24. News24 editors also reserve the right to edit or delete any and all comments received. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Read more from our Users

Submitted by
Walter Maja
No end to political killings in K...

With the Moerane Commission still investigating the political killings at KwaZulu-Natal it’s disheartening that the province still continues to experience same brutal killings of politicians. Read more...

0 comments 237 views
Submitted by
Rev Maudu Morudu
Mugabe left a legacy of dictators...

What happened to Mugabe is a clear lesson that, the political future of those who want to stay in power forever does not last long. Read more...

0 comments 152 views
Submitted by
Rodgers Buluma
Entrepreneurship the only way to ...

Job opportunities in Kenya and across the world have become treasures to both the elites and those who are educationally challenged. Read more...

0 comments 80 views
Submitted by
Sibongile Mlangeni
Christians must not pay tithes

Christian tithing has no New Testament example and no command either. It is unscriptural for Christians to pay tithes. It was meant for a specific nation for specific purposes.  Read more...

0 comments 5693 views
Submitted by
Pedro Mzileni
Student depression: Why some stud...

The successful people who have graduated think that sharing their stories is a sign of weakness. The socio-academically struggling students think that asking for help is a sign of weakness.  Read more...

0 comments 504 views
Submitted by
Ken Sibanda
Mugabe still subject to civil law...

The immunity granted to President Mugabe this Tuesday, while it covers criminal and civil charges in Zimbabwe, does not cover civil lawsuits filed in foreign countries on his person. Read more...

0 comments 636 views


RSS feeds News delivered really simply.

E-mail Newsletters You choose what you want

News24 on Android Get the latest from News24 on your Android device.

SMS Alerts Get breaking news stories via SMS.

Interactive Advertising Bureau
© 2017 All rights reserved.
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.