MyNews24 is a user-generated section of The stories here come from users.

Comments: 3
Article views: 2109
Latest Badges:

View all Piesangpriester's badges.

The fairy tale of child abuse

31 March 2014, 12:10

Due to allegations of physical,emotional,and sexual abuse hundreds of children are interviewed each year by law enforcement ,child protetive services and other professionals.The outcome of these interviews is frequently tendered as uncorroborated,yet compelling evidence in a criminal trial,increasing its significance and the need for debadebility.
As i was also a victim of  false charges of sexual abuse and i know i was innocent and suddenly all this evidence is pilling up i could not understand how this can be true.I realizes that child sexual abuse is a horrific crime and this paper is in no way an attempt to ignore or minimize the importance of child sexual abuse but this paper is to point out that there is a lot of biased unlawfull prosseses that the ''child saving industry ''uses that resulted in wrongful verdicts and convictions against innocent people.This has become a social tragedy!!!!!
In fear of missing even one abused child these child saving industry workers perform extensive investigations on vague and apparently unsupported reports and uses any means possible to confirm these reports to prosecute.

The legal system should be more concerned with the accused than the children,but we all know that the reverse is true.Is this a catch-22-a sitiation where the innocent must be ignored to protect the innocent?This dilemma exists today.
Today the catch is that anyone accused of child sexual abuse is guilty, if they deny it.65% of allegations are unfounded and untrue[not guilty verdicts],20% of all allegations,convictions was obtain based on theories,inference and speculation.Only 15% of all allegations ,convictions was obtain by real and physical evedince. but it does not stop the child saving industry to continue to prosecute.[Currently as per newspaper articals the child saving industry is looking at more ways to secure convictions as they are concerned about the low rate of convictions in South Africa]

Public hysteria regarding child molestation has changed the rules of the criminal justice system. Child physical and sexual abuse cases must be defended in an entirely different manner than the normal criminal case. In theory the constitutional rights of the defendant are still in place, however in reality those rights do not apply. The truth is: The accused is presumed to be guilty.

There is merely an appearance of constitutional rights for the accused in a child abuse case. The judge will still put it  that it must presume the defendant to be innocent and require the state to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. However in reality, once a false allegation is made, the defendant must both prove himself innocent and that something “did not happen”.

Our criminal justice system states that if the judge has a “reasonable doubt” then it must find the defendant “not guilty”. This theory simply does not apply to child sexual assault cases. The judge must be convinced he/she are not letting a child molester off and back into the community. The judge must absolutely believe in the innocence of the defendant. The state does not have to prove guilt, but simply make the accusation. Once the accusation is made, the defendant must prove innocence beyond a reasonable doubt. Failing that, the judge will not take a chance the defendant may be a child molester, and will convict.

How Did We Come to This?

The media, legislature and the “child saving industry” has created a national child molestation hysteria. Through their well funded efforts, the general public is convinced a child molester lurks behind every tree, waiting for the golden opportunity to snatch a child. In addition, not satisfied with just terrifying the public, these forces have created a perception that child abuse is rampantly occurring behind the closed doors of our neighbors and friends.

Many politicians seek and maintain their positions by running campaigns aimed at the voter’s emotional desire to protect children. An effective way to follow this campaign promise is to enact laws that eliminate basic rights of criminal defendants charged with any form of child abuse.[The current act THE SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT 32 OF 2007 makes it a crime for a grandfather to put his granddaughter on his lap[;attempted rape;]giving her sweets or money [;grooming;]if any,any one,files a suspision complaint against him...He wil be prosecuted.

Prosecutors and the child saving industry have convinced the legislature that merely creating hysteria is not enough to insure conviction for those accused. In addition, rights originally created in our constitution to protect the criminal defendants must be eliminated.

All across our nation, state legislatures have supported child advocacy special interest groups. The following illustrates how constitutional rights have been taken away in child sexual assault trials:

1. No Right to Confront Your Accuser:

Criminal law codes have been rewritten to where in many cases, the child accuser does not have to appear in court and face the accused. Instead, the state can offer the child’s testimony through an interpreter that is an agent of the prosecution.
The child gets trained with dolls in precourt sessions under the idea that she is showed how the court prosses is working,where the defence is going to sit ext,and what she must say if she was ask certain questions by the defence.

2. “Hearsay Evidence”:

“Hearsay” evidence is when a witness testifies about something they do not personally know, but were told by someone else. Hearsay is considered unreliable and is normally inadmissible as evidence against an accused. In child abuse cases however, hearsay evidence is admitted as evidence of guilt. A so called “outcry” witness can testify as to what a child supposedly said to them regarding the alleged abuse EVEN if it did not happen OR wasnt said.Most of the times it was suspicion and the child was confronted and forced to admit thru leading,suggsetive,and couched questions that something did happen and this become the childs actual 'outcry'.  

3. “Syndrome Evidence” Is Admissible Against the Accused:

In South Africa,the prosecution can have an expert witness testify that the child is suffering from “Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome”(CSAAS). This psychological “mumble jumble” is an unscientific theory of supposed traits of abused children. The psychologist who came up with this syndrome many years ago has since indicated that this theory is not reliable evidence in a court of law. Prosecutors do not care! This junk science makes its appearance in courtrooms across the country daily.
With syndrome evidence, the state replaces its lack of real proof with speculation. CSAAS theorizes that because an alleged victim is supposedly demonstrating certain behavioral patterns that he / she must have actually been abused. Unfortunately, a big problem with this and other syndromes is that the character traits offered to show abuse are also common for non-abused children. If the child has been crying, he / she must have been abused. If the child has nightmares, he / she must have been abused. If the child is withdrawn, he /she must have been abused. If the child is outgoing, he /she must have been abused. If the child is happy around the accused, its because the child enjoyed the abuse. The list of factors goes on forever. But to a judge, when an expert witness is connecting typical childhood behavior with indicators of abuse, the testimony is extremely damaging to the falsely accused.

4. Convictions Without Physical Evidence:

Our prisons are full of persons who have been convicted of child molestation without any real or physical evidence ever introduced against them at trial. In other words, the typical evidence in which the state offers to convict a defendant, such as body fluids, blood, semen, hair, DNA, are not introduced at trial to link the accused to a crime.

Medical nurses and employees whose livelihoods depend upon their employment with child advocacy centers will give opinions that a child was abused. Failure to give the right opinion will mean their employment contract is not renewed. These opinions from medical “experts” will say the findings are “consistent with” sexual abuse. Of course, “consistent with” is not a true medical diagnosis. This testimony, as demonstrated by a competent defense attorney will reveal the findings given as “consistent with abuse” are just as “inconsistent with abuse”.Medical nurses manupilate the j88[medical document for court]as informed by the investigator.Basicaly it means that a medical nurses opinion[mainly of the investigator] is stated as fact in court,by the prosecution to the judge.During my own investigation i can prove that the medical is a big fraud.I had  the case where a child[a copy is kept at hospital]was diagnosed negetively,no penetration,no clefts seen,and was changed by the investigating officer to positive for an arrest.5 months later the origenal medical 'expert rewrite the j88 to show actual abuse did happen,completely different than her first opinion 5 months before, based on the same complaint a year ago.In a second case the child was diagnosed that their is no evidence of any sexual abuse by a medical expert.a Month later the investigating officer just took her to another medical expert whos opinion was that their was bruises,ext
and that the child was in pain.The j88 was based on a complaint a year ago before the first medical experts opinion.The child herself denied that she was sexualy abused.All these medical reports was not on the docket.Only the ones that showed actual abuse did happened.I had to optain them unlawfull myself.

Instead of physical and medical evidence, the falsely accused are convicted upon theories, inferences, and speculation. Prosecutors secure convictions by manipulating the judges fear of releasing a child molester back into the community. This fear will be combined with hearsay, expert witness “syndrome evidence”, misleading medical testimony, and the biased opinions of child advocacy investigators.

To support this speculation, a biased child protective services caseworker will produce a written interview statement of the child. This biased interviewer will use leading, suggestive, and coached questions to easily obtain an “admission” from a child. Many times the child does not make a statement that abuse occurred, but merely agrees with the adult authority figure who informs the child of the abuse.My investigation can show that they interogate a child for 2 to 3 hours and if the child keeps on denieing they keep on going.In one of my cases they harrased the child for 5 months,took her 3 times to a doctor,visited her daily at her house and school before they could get a statement from her.She was showed with dolls what to say and a fisical demonstration was given to her where she was showed with the investigating officer present on a teacherS lap what she must say before her statement was taken.THE INTERVIEW STATEMENT WILL READ THAT THE CHILD SHOWED THEM ON THE TEACHER WHAT HAPPENED.

After an outcry, it is easy to find witnesses who can place the accused in circumstances in which he was alone with the alleged victim.

5. Independent Facts Which Lead To An Allegation:

The situations that create false allegations depending upon circumstances, for example:

A. False allegations have been made by mothers who desire to gain the upper hand in a custody battle.
B. Teen age children have alleged abuse to get the disciplinarian father out of the house.
C. School age children will fabricate abuse after observing "Good Touch, Bad Touch" type films at school.
D. Children know more about sex than our society is willing to recognize. They are bombarded with sexual overtones through the movies, magazines and advertisements and the biggest evil,,cellphones.
E. Some children make false allegations for attention.One girl that i investigated made 5[five] allegations since she was 3 years old,She is now 10.
F. Some children make false allegations after hearing about real sexual abuses that have occurred to friends or classmates.
G. POLICE officers that gets status, awards,for investigating a case and get a conviction.85% of cases was instigated by police officers thru ,school programs and tip offs by teachers.No actual report by the child herself.
H.False accusations occur for the most part in situations where the accused is vulnerble,such as in divorce custody proceedings,foster parents,school bus drivers,priest in church,school teachers ext.Virtualy anyone whose private or professional life puts them in close contact with children are susceptible to false accusations.
I.Young girls are sexualy active with older boys.When they are caught they scream abuse or they use it to manipilate the boys.One case i investigated the girl kept her underwear for 4 months after she and her boyfriend broke up and when she saw that he was not interested in her any more she opened a rape case and handed in the undewear as prove.She was 14 years old and he was 18 both in the same school.ANOTHER CASE THAT WAS ON MEDIA 24 WAS OF THE TEACHER THAT WAS ACCUSED OF ABUSE.SADLY HE COMMITED SUICIDE.AFTER HIS DEATH THE GIRLS CAME OUT WITH THE TRUTH.HE WAS INNOCENT.These girls know how the system works.

Summary : Recipe for conviction:

1. “Outcry” from a child, interpreted as abuse;Most of the times not willingly but by means of an interegation by a member of the child saving industry,like teachers,[85%] of allegations was reported via or by teachers in South Africa, only on suspicion.
2. Reporting of the outcry by a person required by law to report any suspicion of child abuse, or someone with a hidden agenda or motive;sometimes unnonismely.
3. A biased investigation by employees of the child saving industry;proof is that they make their own assumpsion and the child is couched and trained via leading,suggestive questions,and false memory implants.
4. A biased medical report by a “nurse” contracted by the child saving industry;
5. Syndrome evidence from an “expert” witness;
6. Circumstantial evidence of the accused’s opportunity to be alone with the child.
7. Motive or other variables leading to an accusation.

What should you do once an allegation has been made?

"I'm innocent. This is crazy. If I talk to them and explain it will go away." This is the initial feeling of the wrongfully accused. They have done nothing wrong and therefore there should be no adverse consequences. Those in authority will quickly recognize their innocence, the mistake, the overreaction, and it will all go away.

For the self-proclaimed child savers though, no mistakes are ever made. "Of course the accused will deny it. Who among us would admit to being a child molester? Children do not lie. Adults lie. Molesters lie. You are lying." This is the mind-set of those who will prosecute you. Child protective services caseworkers and prosecutors believe the case is over once the child makes an outcry of abuse and that outcry is subsequently substantiated during their written interview. No other evidence is necessary for them to submit the case to a court. No physical evidence of abuse. No medical evidence of abuse. Nothing.You will be arrested.THEY ONLY NEED A WRITTEN STATEMENT!!!!mostly obtained via leading and suggestive questions.

Now they may try to get such evidence. However, in their minds a failure to obtain it does not undermine their conviction that abuse has occurred. Hymen still intact? Well the hymen does not have to be broken in order for abuse to occur, or for digital penetration. Lack of semen? Well, of course, this offense occurred over the course of years and the child did not make an outcry immediately after the incident. Lack of substantiating witnesses? No matter, molesters work behind closed doors, in private, when no one else is around to witness. Lack of criminal record for the accused? The accused is a child molester, he is interested in secretly abusing children, not in committing adult crimes. Has the accused pass a polygraph test? Those are not admissible because a savvy adult can manipulate such tests.

Rule No. 1: Nothing an accused can say or do will convince a childsaver (Child Protective Service, child advocacy prosecutor, police investigator) that the abuse did not occur. NOTHING!

Rule No. 2: Talking to Child Protective Services or the police investigator, or anyone without an attorney present is the single worst thing a wrongfully accused person can do.

Rule No. 3: In most cases an experienced attorney will not allow you to talk to Child Protective Services or the police or give a statement. The attorney knows whatever you say will be used against you.

The violation of the above three rules by those falsely accused is commonplace. An innocent person believes sanity will intervene at some point, and decides to cooperate fully with the police and Child Protective Services. The accused gives written statements and videotaped statements to CPS and the police. In addition, the accused talk on the phone to detectives and caseworkers. They talk in the investigators offices without knowing whether they are being recorded. They often talk themselves into a corner that is extremely difficult to ever get out of.

Unfortunately, Child Protective Services and the police are not interested in conducting a fair and thorough investigation. The accused who walks into the child advocacy center without an experienced attorney to “tell their side of things” or “clear this all up” is doing exactly what the authorities want. The child savers know what they are doing. At this meeting they will obtain real or implied admissions and circumstances presenting opportunity for abuse coming from the accused’s own mouth.

The Child Protective Service investigator will start off by asking questions that appear to be innocuous but are intentional set up questions. The investigator may ask an alleged perpetrator if they have ever given their child a bath or changed a diaper. The accused will answer “Yes” as that is a normal parental function. Then the investigator will move in for the kill. The next questions will focus on other instances in which the alleged perpetrator has touched the genital areas of the child.

For example, the investigator may ask if you have ever touched your child’s bottom or genital area. If the accused says “No”, the next question will be whether you have ever wiped your child’s bottom after changing a diaper. This will be followed by whether you have ever applied medicine or a lotion for diaper rash. After the accused says “Yes”, the investigator will become more aggressive. “Are you now are admitting to touching your child’s genital area?”. The accused, knowing that any contact was done without sexual intent and solely for personal hygiene reasons is confused. The accused may say, “No, not in the manner that you are describing”. The investigator will follow up by saying, “ Are you now denying touching your child’s genital area?” The follow up questions will be to establish opportunity for abuse, such as: “Are you ever alone with your child? Have you given baths while alone with the child? “ Applied medication to your child without any one else around ? What about the date of the allegation, isn’t it true that you were alone with your child at that time?”
Believe me, these people are good!!!!!!!!!!!!.They will make you say exatly what they want you to say.  

The falsely accused now will face an official investigative report which will read like this:

‘Alleged perpetrator at first denied any sexual contact with child, but then after questioning admitted such contact. When this inconsistency was pointed out by the investigator, the perpetrator attempted to limit admission of contact by stating that same was done “only while giving baths and applying medications”. Investigator finds alleged perpetrators answers to be inconsistent, evasive, and untruthful.’

A knowledgeable attorney can provide the accused with an appearance of cooperation with authorities without providing evidence against yourself. The investigators cannot twist your words and dictate their interpretation of what you said if you have not talked to them!! The attorney can assist you in making the decision of whether to meet with child protective services or the police. In most situations, the attorney knows that the arrest and charge decision has already been made and that a meeting will not change the forthcoming prosecution.

Finding the Right ATTORNEY
Very few attorneys specialize in fighting false allegations. Many lawyers represent clients with child abuse and child sexual assault charges. These lawyers will handle such cases in addition to a general criminal defense practice. Child Sexual Assault cases are different than the typical criminal charge and must be handled differently!

The falsely accused must have an attorney that does more than mere representation. The attorney must actually defend the falsely accused. Incredibly, many times an attorney will take the case and concern themselves with a disposition that meets with the satisfaction of the prosecution and judge.They drink coffee together. The prosecutor and judge are the enemy in child abuse cases!

Consider the following in hiring the right attorney:

1. Length of Practice and Experience.

A false allegation case can only be defended successfully by an attorney with significant trial experience and specifically with child sexual assault cases. The falsely accused are not in a position to have inexperienced counsel.

Unfortunately, the police, Child Protective Services, and the public will consider you to be guilty. For the falsely accused it is important to act immediately. The falsely accused must prove their innocence! An attorney who does not begin an all out defense at the very beginning is wasting valuable time and compromising your future.

It is a false allegation. This needs to be vocalized and acted upon. The charge is false. The allegations are untrue. Scream it until someone hears. And if your attorney does not hear, then fire him/her and hire someone else.

There is no “home field advantage”in sexual assault cases. Do not shy away from a good attorney who is located in a different province from where you are being charged. It makes no difference how well a local attorney knows the judge, that will not be of any assistance with this type of charge.They all drink coffee together. An “outsider” who does not care about making the judge or prosecutor happy, but just wants to defend you and win is much better than a local name.
For a child abuse or child sexual assault allegation, the best is an attorney who specializes primarily in those cases to the exclusion of other cases.

2. Reject Plea Bargains.

A false allegation of child sexual assault must be beaten through either a dismissal or an acquittal (not guilty finding) at trial. There is no victory in a plea bargain with these cases. The innocent person's life will be destroyed by pleading guilty. At no time in dealing with a false allegation should there ever be an admission of guilt. A plea bargain may seem an easy way out, but it will ruin the life of the falsely accused forever.The police will try to obtain such an admission of guilt from you at any cost.threats,intimidation tactics.they will try,they are trained for that.I have experienced it myself.  

Deferred Adjudication, successfully served will not result in a conviction for the defendant. However, the lack of a formal conviction really is meaningless. Whether the accused receives deferred, straight probation, or is released on parole, he will still have to register as a sex offender. Registration is by nature, public, and will result in the nature of the charges being made known to anyone. Registration results in the loss of employment and the inability to secure future meaningful employment.

Community Supervision for sex offenders also requires sex offender treatment courses.[PEDOSTOP] In these courses the offender is required to admit that not only the actual charge is true, but also any additional charges or allegations made in police or Child Protective Service reports are true. It matters not that the charge is exaggerated, untrue, or only partially true. It matters not that the extraneous other charges did not occur. Failure to admit that everything alleged is true will result in a revocation of community supervision and placement in the penitentiary.

The prosecution will tempt the inexperienced defense attorney with offers of deferred adjudication and “treatment” instead of incarceration. Do not fall for this trap. Sex Offender probation has but one goal: to take all of the defendant's money and then revoke him and send him to the penitentiary. The percentage of defendants who successfully make it through community supervision probation without being revoked is small. The reason it is so difficult to complete probation is the rules keep changing. Making community supervision more difficult for sex offenders is a favorite of the legislature. The changes politicians make offer the appearance of fighting child molestation. No lobby group exists for sex offenders and politicians can make community supervision success impossible.

A sexual assault conviction will mean that you will lose your children,friends,job,everything!!!!!!

3. Prepare a vigorous defense to avoid prosecution.

If an attorney says to wait and see if your are convicted; walk away immediately;;
The defense can also provide expert witness reports and affidavits explaining the unreliability and tainted evidence obtained by the prosecution.This is very expensive as you have to pay them yourself as of where the state uses taxpayers money to pay their expert witnesses and has unlimited funds.YES PEOPLE"STATE WITNESSES GETS PAID"

A false allegation of sexual abuse,is abuse!!!!!!!!!.I believe that those who are empowered to protect children must be accountable,profesional,and uphold the highest standerd of care.I believe false accusers must be prosecuted.I believe that todays children must be protected from the same people that are suppose to protect them.The child saving industry has became the abusers.The state has the child under their complete and total influence and during my investigations into my own case and some others i obtained via my court appearences, fisical,emotional and even sexual abuse[DEMONSTRATIONS],threats,bribes and cajoling, and suggestive questioning was common practice to obtain statements,.[I HEARD OF AN INTERVIEWER WHO REPEATED THE SAME QUESTION 11 TIMES DURING AN 18 MINUTE INTERVIEW,EVEN THOUGH SHE GOT A CLEAR NO ANSWER EACH TIME.THE INTERVIEWER LATER REPORTED THAT"BASED ON SCIENTIFICALY BASED TECHNIQUES"SHE HAD CONCLUDED THAT THE CHILD IS IN DENIAL THAT SHE WAS ABUSED BECAUSE SHE IS AFRAID"].Todays interviewers become validators on a mission to extract information necessary to successfully procecute the accused.In so doing the interviewer takes the role of interrogater and ignores information that does not fit into a preconceived notion.Even if a child denies she was abused the agents will use in combination of biological,cognitive and sosial immaturity of children and suggestive,repetitive and otherwise contaminating questioning techniques to make the child believe something did happen.[false memory implants]


It is hoped that this information will be of help to anyone who is ever facing the tremendous horror of a false accusation. With a good lawyer, and a strong fight, these accusations can be overcome. It is an uphill battle, with many bruises and bleeding along the way. But there is no other way than to fight like hell.I thought of suicide myself many times and their was times that i came close to making that decision but that is not the way out either.GET HELP!!!!!
Please feel free to tell me your story.Send your story to do not use real names?

Disclaimer: All articles and letters published on MyNews24 have been independently written by members of News24's community. The views of users published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24. News24 editors also reserve the right to edit or delete any and all comments received. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Read more from our Users

Submitted by
Sean Parker
Which car would you max on this r...

If given the opportunity to reach the top speed of any car on an airfield, which set of wheels would you choose to go blisteringly quick in a straight line? Read more...

0 comments 3703 views
Submitted by
Third force behind The President'...

Politics is a knife that cuts into the Public every which way it can. Politics is the sociopath, the Public its willing victim. The Public needs to demand better instead of praising sensationalism, gossip and bias over logic and truth. Read more...

0 comments 665 views
Submitted by
Palestinians have nothing to gain...

Palestinian political unity is the biggest threat to the occupation. And demanding that Hamas disarm is the biggest threat to the unity agreement between Palestinian factions. Read more...

0 comments 77 views
Submitted by
Robyn Boake
Once the pride of CT, the MyCiti ...

Up until recently it was a service that Capetonians were proud of, a service bragged about as an example of what could be achieved as a solution for the masses. But that all changed. Read more...

0 comments 409 views
Submitted by
Jan Badenhorst
Matric results in less than a mon...

The matric results for the 2017 matric class will be available to students at their schools, in the newspapers and online, on 5 January 2018. Read more...

0 comments 706 views
Submitted by
Lindie Langa
#CR17 camp must guard against ove...

Anything is still possible, and it doesn't take a miracle for the votes to swing any which way on voting day. Read more...

0 comments 107 views


RSS feeds News delivered really simply.

E-mail Newsletters You choose what you want

News24 on Android Get the latest from News24 on your Android device.

SMS Alerts Get breaking news stories via SMS.

Interactive Advertising Bureau
© 2017 All rights reserved.
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.