MyNews24 is a user-generated section of The stories here come from users.

Michael Simpson, Cybershrink on Health24
Comments: 0
Article views: 1835
Latest Badges:

View all Michael Simpson, Cybershrink on Health24's badges.

Noakes punished for being popular

16 November 2016, 12:34

The Persecution of Professor Noakes continues

Cybershrink continue to explore the unprofessional conduct of the HPCSA / Medical Council

The Health Professions Council, totally unfit for purpouse, continues to act bizarrely and improperly in continuing to harass and attack one of the nicest men in South African medicine, UCT’s Prof Tim Noakes. In my two previous columns (listed below ), I described the absurd way the Council has acted in forcing a prolonged and horrifically expensive trial of this man based on a wholly trivial complaint on silly grounds, in what looks unpleasantly like professional (or unprofessional) jealousy, with some ugly hints that Big Food may be behind the fuss, not liking the good doctor’s views on a healthy diet. 

Sentence First: Verdict Afterwards.  

Alice in Wonderland lives: in Pretoria. Recently, when the main hearings finished, the Council did one of the most amazingly daft and disgraceful things ever seen in such a situation. They issued an official bulletin announcing to the world that Noakes had been found guilty of unprofessional conduct. The snag was, this was totally untrue : he hadn’t been found guilty of anything at all. It’s hard to understand how anyone at the Council could have been so resoundingly stupid as to seriously issue a false statement of a verdict that hadn’t been reached, in a manner appallingly damaging to a distinguished South African. Though the Council, over an hour later, retracted the statement with a faint apology, why haven’t they identified and sacked the person responsible for this? Did someone act without authorization from the Council’s leaders? Surely the leadership can’t have been so ignorant of the rules they’re well paid to apply, that they didn’t understand their own procedures? 

The process still has some way to go, with complex legal arguments and due consideration by the Committee in 2017. In other circumstances, this might have been considered slander, even leading to the Council being sued: one hopes Noakes’ legal team is seriously considering this,  to encourage the chaotic Council to learn how to pay proper attention to due process, to behave professionally and to treat people with respect.

Surely nobody who has paid intelligent attention to the proceedings and the evidence could find Prof Noakes guilty of anything at all, other than remarkable patience in the face of profound and consistent silliness. 

It isn’t a privilege, but the absolute duty of any professor to profess: to know their field and clearly express their views to the public. No-one should ever be victimized for doing so. 

Summarizing very briefly, Noakes, author of best-selling books about the Banting diet, tends to tweet rather a lot, and a long while ago received a question by tweet, from a woman asking about weaning a baby; and suggested a Banting type approach.

Promptly, a little known woman,  then leader of a group of dieticians, the Association for Dietetics in SA (ADSA), grew furious and made a formal complaint to the Council, insisting that he shouldn’t have given such nutritional advice, and that it was unscientific (though there is an enormous body of scientific research supporting his views). More peculiarly, it was reported that she contacted the woman concerned, telling her to ignore the professor’s advice and, much worse, suggesting the woman should contact her for further advice, providing contact details. This would be a specific offense against professional codes of conduct. Yet the Council has totally ignored the issue of this definite breach of their rules of professional conduct, and has instead in an ugly and disorganized way, pursued a nasty case against the professor. 

My earlier columns (links below) outlined the remarkable foolishness of the process thus far.

Late in the recent meetings, something very odd seemed to happen. It seemed as though those responsible for starting this whole sorry mess, seem to be trying to obscure their role, though previously admitted. When Noakes’ advocate introduced a letter it seemed to greatly upset the HPCSA lawyers who struggled to prevent it from getting into evidence. 

Noakes lawyer Adam Pike wrote to the ADSA recently asking for clarification: does the ADSA accept that the dietician lodged a complaint against the professor; whether she (a past president of ADSA) had obtained it’s authority to lodge the complaint; and did ADSA fully support the HPCSA’s continuing prosecution of the complaint. They didn’t reply.

The question was relevant, because this October the current executive of ADSA told its members the Council was “investigating a query “ (something it actually doesn’t do), and that their former Chair had simply “sought clarity from the HPCSA on the use of social media as a professional medium by health practitioners” and “did not call for a hearing”. This doesn’t match the available facts, and contradicts her own evidence to the inquiry.

She wrote a complaint to the council, not a query. She used her personal address, and didn’t say she was acting on behalf of ADSA.  She said, for instance “I urge the HPCSA to please take urgent action against this type of misconduct”. And claimed that his advice was “dangerous” and “can potentially be life threatening” though there’s no good evidence that this is so. The Council eventually wrote to tell Noakes she had complained (not that she had raised a query) and a year later said the complainant was ADSA. 

It seems the ADSA and the Council want to avoid answering questions about this, claiming, ridiculously, that this is “sub judice”, when no judge is involved, and even if there were, there’d be nothing wrong with revealing the identity of the complainant. The HPCSA advocate tried so hard and so often to keep this letter from the proceedings, remarkably calling it “highly prejudicial” to the Council, he made it obvious there must be something very important about this. What is it he seemed so desperate to avoid? Fortunately, the sensible Chairman of the Inquiry allowed the letter into evidence, and he hope this will be fully explored.

It’s very hard to get the Council to answer a query,  let alone to spend vast amounts of public money investigating one.  I can testify that even serious complaints are often ignored completely.  

If the complaint is dismissed with the contempt it deserves, who will pay the enormous costs of Noakes’ defense? What if he, understandably, sues the Council and complainants? 

There are reports that the responsible dietitian was advised not to attend much of the hearing. If so: why? If she changed her mind and wanted her complaint to be considered a query: why did the process continue?

Is the Dept. of Healthy concerned that their new “prudent diet” may be scientifically wrong? There have been many rumours that Big Food,  major companies profiting from the bad old advice the Banting Diet contradicts, may have been behind this process. Is there any basis for this?  If so, what should be done about it?


And Marika Sboros in her excellent reporting in FoodMed.Net 

Disclaimer: All articles and letters published on MyNews24 have been independently written by members of News24's community. The views of users published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24. News24 editors also reserve the right to edit or delete any and all comments received.


Read more from our Users

Submitted by
Annette Nel
Water crisis: City of Cape Town h...

Unluckily, the toilets have to be flushed or epidemics will be the next problem. I understand the drought, but I'm sorry, you as government have left it to late. Read more...

0 comments 2242 views
Submitted by
Lawrence Fengu
Dealing with Zimbabwe's fault lin...

Zimbabwe has been a ticking time bomb for almost two decades and, in that period, SADC actions have merely been a futile exercise of papering over the cracks. Read more...

0 comments 202 views
Submitted by
Ken Sibanda
Why Robert Mugabe should not agre...

Military rule in Africa has done nothing but cause continued human suffering in all parts of the world. Read more...

0 comments 5359 views
Submitted by
Michelle Swanepoel
Praise for Mugabe is baffling

The country is run by fear. If you want too look at a father of independence, then look at Mandela. Read more...

0 comments 1258 views
Submitted by
Langa Khumalo
The Last Massacre, Zimbabwe's im...

The final pieces have been set, the fool's show goes on and the horror that is about to happen in Zimbabwe will be historical if not biblical. Read more...

0 comments 3753 views
Submitted by
The Rise and Fall of Democracy!

Nothing can be more truer than the fact that Democracy is the Government by the People and for the People!  Read more...

0 comments 359 views


RSS feeds News delivered really simply.

E-mail Newsletters You choose what you want

News24 on Android Get the latest from News24 on your Android device.

SMS Alerts Get breaking news stories via SMS.

Interactive Advertising Bureau
© 2017 All rights reserved.
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.