MyNews24 is a user-generated section of The stories here come from users.

Comments: 0
Article views: 1145
Latest Badges:

View all So,Recently's badges.

The Best Candidate for President

11 July 2017, 09:22

I identified the moderate, conservative Ramaphosa faction, as opposed to the radical, racial Zuma faction. In this essay I will set out to argue why it would be better for South Africa if the Ramaphosa faction won.

As mentioned before, the Zuma faction has called for the expropriation of land without compensation. The Ramaphosa faction has expressed a desire for land reform, but done in a more moderate manner that would benefit all South Africans. Expropriation without compensation would be the worst option for South Africa. The agriculture sector employed 750 000 people in 1996, with the Western Cape’s agricultural sector providing jobs for 250 000 people in 2016.

In 2014, agriculture accounted for roughly 4% of South Africa’s GDP, while also being a net-exporter as an industry. As a net exporter, the agricultural sector is extremely important to the state, since it brings in more foreign currency into the country. Therefore, the South African agricultural sector is important to the South African economy, through providing jobs, contributing a sizeable amount to the country’s GDP, and being a net exporter.

In contrast, the current South African policy of land reformation had had disastrous results for the agricultural sector. In 2011, the government had only reformed 5% of land, well short of their goal of reforming 30% of land by 2014. Not only had the government failed to reach these goals, the majority of land that had been reformed had failed. When given the option of land or monetary compensation, the majority of beneficiaries chose the latter. In addition, a study has also found that between 70-90% of the land reform projects had failed, due to a lack of experience on the part of the new farmers or a lack of support from the government. Finally, the disastrous effects of expropriating land without compensation can clearly be seen from in the example of Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe went from being a net-exporter to being one of Africa’s largest food importers.

Their food security had gone in into freefall and the threat of famine is a constant fear. Expropriating land without compensation had not benefitted anyone in Zimbabwe, and neither will it in South Africa.

Although any land reform would probably be liable to have a negative effect on the agricultural sector, the approach taken by Ramaphosa will undeniably be the lesser of two evils. He has not mentioned how he wishes to redistribute land, but he has placed emphasis on the fact that new land owners will need support from the government to turn a profit on their new farm. The lack of governmental support thus far had caused the most of new farms to fail.

The next point is the point of White Monopoly Capital, and the demonization of it by the Zuma faction. First and foremost, it must be mentioned that the phrase WMC had most likely been a phrase invented and introduced by the UK-based PR firm Bell Pottinger to divert attention away from Zuma’s doings. With that said, the idea of WMC is ridiculous. It is impossible to racially define or identify capital. Capital include things like the ownership of shares on the JSE, the owners of which are too various to be able to racially identify. Furthermore, a great deal of capital in South Africa is owned by individuals living overseas. In 2015, half of the top 40 shares on the JSE were owned by foreigners.

It is also a bad idea to demonize capital and regard it as the enemy. Capital is in truth the friend of a country’s economy, and thus its government. South Africa has been plagued by a lack of capital throughout the years. Recently, the ANC had correctly identified the unwillingness of the private sector to invest in South Africa as detrimental to economic growth.

This is a correct assessment. The fact is, though, that capital is needed to invest. Therefore, by demonizing capital and the owners of capital, the Zuma faction is creating a hostile environment for capital investment, and actively contributing to the stalling of South Africa’s economy. In contrast, the Ramaphosa faction has recognized that capital cannot be defined racially, and that it is not the enemy of South Africa.

In conclusion, Ramaphosa’s more moderate views on land reformation, and embrace of capital as a friend, would benefit the country more than the Zuma faction’s proposed policy of expropriation without compensation and demonizing of capital.

Disclaimer: All articles and letters published on MyNews24 have been independently written by members of News24's community. The views of users published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24. News24 editors also reserve the right to edit or delete any and all comments received.


Read more from our Users

Submitted by
Bert Hall
Where are we headed?

Our president can send the best people he can muster around the world (envoys he calls them) to drum up investment for SA but it won’t happen if he cannot ensure a constant economical source of electricity. Read more...

0 comments 22 views
Submitted by
Sean Beukes
A conundrum: To vote DA or Cyril?...

A conundrum ... Do I vote DA even though I'm not sure if they can save us? Or, do I vote ANC, in the hope that Cyril can save us? Read more...

0 comments 69 views
Submitted by
Dr. Rabelani Dagada
Today is better than yesterday in...

Due to the better quality of life in this province, many people have been relocating to Gauteng to have access to better social and infrastructure services, and to get employment opportunities.  Read more...

0 comments 503 views
Submitted by
Sydney Molepolle
Thinking beyond the 2019 national...

A change in policy is an important step towards change, meaning there would be invigorated approaches to better our livelihoods. Read more...

0 comments 121 views
Submitted by
Gautrain bus drivers and cycling ...

Government should really start promoting safe cycling for cyclists by installing cycle-lanes in our cities. Read more...

0 comments 828 views
Submitted by
Tackling the resilience of racism...

In the 25 years since apartheid was abolished, what exactly has the government done to uplift the youth of South Africa?  Read more...

0 comments 352 views


Press Code We subscribe to the Press Code.

E-mail Newsletters You choose what you want

News24 on Android Get the latest from News24 on your Android device.

Terms and Conditions Terms and Conditions - Updated April 2012

Interactive Advertising Bureau
© 2019 All rights reserved.
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.