ANC protects whistleblowers, not media

Cape Town - Ruling party MPs on Tuesday accepted changes to the protection of information bill to protect whistleblowers who disclose state secrets, but baulked at doing the same for the media.

Opposition lawmakers on Parliament's ad hoc committee redrafting the controversial bill, reiterated a call for a so-called "public interest" defence to be introduced.

Such a clause would allow journalists who publish classified information under pain of lengthy prison sentences to argue that they had done so for the public good, and has been advocated by rights groups, lawyers and media houses.

But the idea was slapped down by ANC committee chair Cecil Burgess who said the topic was not up for discussion at this stage.

"The issue we need to consider is in which way is the bill interfering in the rights of whistleblowers. The bill says you have the right to run to the police.

"It in no way allows you to rush off the media," he said in response to proposal from the Democratic Alliance and Inkatha Freedom Party.

State law advisors had inserted safeguards for whistleblowers by amending section 38 of the bill by making it subject to the provisions of the Protected Disclosures Act and the new Companies Act.

Outcry

The bill is being redrafted following an outcry over the far-reaching powers it gave the state to classify information.

The government conceded that a provision for the classification of commercial information should be removed, along with the vague notion of national interest as a reason for keeping information secret. However, opposition parties still argue the draft law's ambit is far too wide.

On Tuesday, they objected to section 33 of the bill, which makes it an offence to make public classified information while you know or should reasonably suspect that it would "directly or indirectly prejudice the state".

IFP MP Mario Oriani-Ambrosini said the notion of prejudicing the state was firstly superfluous because otherwise the information would not have been classified in the first place.

Secondly, "prejudice to the state" seemed suspiciously similar to the now deleted notion of "national interest", he said.

The DA's Dene Smuts said the concept needed to be defined by state law advisors before lawmakers could decide whether it remained or was removed from the bill.

Deliberations on the bill, described by opponents as a bid to silence criticism of the state, is likely to continue next year.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For 14 free days, you can have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today. Thereafter you will be billed R75 per month. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won't be billed. 
Subscribe to News24
Voting Booth
What are your thoughts on the possibility of having permanent Stage 2 or 3 load shedding?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
I'll take that over constant schedule changes
13% - 552 votes
Why are we normalising Eskom’s mess?
72% - 3060 votes
I've already found alternative ways of powering my home/business
15% - 617 votes
Vote
Rand - Dollar
17.21
-0.1%
Rand - Pound
21.32
+0.1%
Rand - Euro
18.70
+0.1%
Rand - Aus dollar
12.24
-0.0%
Rand - Yen
0.13
-0.4%
Platinum
1,016.00
+1.2%
Palladium
1,617.34
-3.0%
Gold
1,929.54
+0.0%
Silver
23.58
-1.4%
Brent Crude
87.47
+1.5%
Top 40
74,766
+0.4%
All Share
80,791
+0.4%
Resource 10
77,871
-0.4%
Industrial 25
103,872
+0.7%
Financial 15
16,281
+0.6%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE