Energy bill: Is there more than meets the eye?

Too much ministerial power and too little consultation were among the top reasons for President Jacob Zuma sending the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Amendment Bill back to Parliament.

President Zuma’s spokesperson, Mac Maharaj, said the bill, which was sent back to Parliament last week after months of awaiting Zuma’s consent, would not pass constitutional muster because:

1.?It elevated certain industry codes and charters, including the codes of good practice for the South African minerals industry, to the rank of national legislation and also gave the minister powers to amend or repeal them without following procedures set out in the Constitution;

2.?It contained sections that would allow the minister to declare minerals and petroleum resources “strategic”, and this was inconsistent with trade agreements;

3.?The national council of provinces and provincial legislatures did not allow enough time for public participation; and

4.?The bill was not referred to the house of traditional leaders for comment.

An exploration company that stands to suffer losses if at least one aspect of the bill isn’t changed is Silver Wave Energy, whose oil exploration concessions almost rival state-owned PetroSA.

The Petroleum Agency SA’s activities map, dated October 2014, shows that Silver Wave has three exploration rights and five technical cooperation permits stretching from Mozambican waters to Saldanha Bay in the Western Cape.

Drilling a single exploration well costs up to $250?million (R2.8?billion) and development about $5 billion, but oil production promises to be lucrative once drillers strike pay dirt.

They could bring in revenues of about $1 billion or more each year, according to figures published by Oceans Economy Lab, under the offshore oil and gas sector, which has been set up as part of government’s operation Phakisa project.

The version Zuma sent back to Parliament grants government a 20% free stake in new oil and gas ventures.

This means Silver Wave stands to incur substantial losses from its eight concessions because it would have to cede profits to government.

Diplomatic information published on WikiLeaks shows that Silver Wave, though registered in Singapore, has close ties to the Burmese regime.

In one document, motivating for his addition to the US’s targeted sanctions list dated May 2009, Silver Wave group chairman Minn Minn Oung is said to have admitted that he received government contracts for onshore and offshore oil and gas development because of his close personal ties to Burma’s minister of energy.

Before Silver Wave bagged its first South African concessions, Burma’s ambassador to South Africa, Oo Lwin, provided top officials with gifts.

Zuma received African gems and art in October 2009, according to declarations of his interests for the 10 months to February 2010 filed with the cabinet secretary. This was followed by a 2010 calendar and various sculptures the following month. No monetary values were provided in the declaration.

The parliamentary register of members’ interests shows deputy president Kgalema Motlanthe received a special 2010 calendar, while international relations and cooperation deputy minister Susan van der Merwe was given gems, picture and art frames valued at around R300.

Later registers do not show further gifts from Lwin.

Neither Oung nor Silver Wave business development director Lee-Kong Lin responded to questions sent by City Press.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For 14 free days, you can have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today. Thereafter you will be billed R75 per month. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won't be billed. 
Subscribe to News24
Voting Booth
Who do you think should accept responsibility for the dire state of Eskom’s power system?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Eskom’s current management must take the fall
4% - 182 votes
Previous bosses from Zuma years are to blame
32% - 1677 votes
Mantashe and govt have been asleep at the wheel
31% - 1596 votes
There are many culprits; it’s a complex situation
33% - 1710 votes
Vote
Rand - Dollar
17.36
-1.1%
Rand - Pound
21.29
-1.3%
Rand - Euro
18.29
-0.9%
Rand - Aus dollar
11.81
-1.5%
Rand - Yen
0.13
-1.2%
Gold
1,797.73
+0.5%
Silver
23.50
+1.9%
Palladium
1,963.22
+1.7%
Platinum
1,030.76
+2.1%
Brent Crude
76.15
-1.3%
Top 40
68,351
+0.1%
All Share
74,548
+0.1%
Resource 10
73,315
-0.7%
Industrial 25
92,605
+1.0%
Financial 15
15,401
-0.9%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE