Food security in SA declining - study

Pretoria - More than half of South Africans do not have regular access to enough food, according to a study released by the Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC) on Tuesday.

Overall, 45.6% of the population were food secure, said Professor Demetre Labadarios.

He was speaking at the release of the SA national health and nutrition examination survey - also known as SANHANES-1 - in Pretoria.

The HSRC defines food security as access to food by all members of a household at all times, to enough food for an active and healthy life.

Hunger

The food trends status in South Africa is classified under three sections - food secure, at risk of hunger, and experiencing hunger.

"Measuring food security is not easy," Labadarios said.

"On a total national level, two out four households in the country are food secure, that is 45.6%.

"Regarding the food insecure, which is those that experience hunger, one out of four households experience hunger. The Western Cape, Gauteng, and the Northern Cape have low levels [of food insecurity] in comparison to other provinces."

Labadarios said that while 26% of the population experienced hunger, 28.6% were living at the risk of being hungry.

The number of citizens living "at the risk of hunger" had risen from 25% in the previous survey in 2008.

According to the 2012 study, the Eastern Cape, followed by Limpopo, had the highest numbers of citizens experiencing food insecurity. Food security was at its highest in the Western Cape.

In comparison to the social attitudes survey done in 2008, national food security had declined from 48% to 45.6%.

The SANHANES-1 survey was compiled by a research consortium comprising the HSRC and the Medical Research Council, and was financed by the health department and the United Kingdom department for international development.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For 14 free days, you can have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today. Thereafter you will be billed R75 per month. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won't be billed. 
Subscribe to News24
Voting Booth
A Section 89 panel headed by former chief justice Sandile Ngcobo found President Cyril Ramaphosa has an impeachable case to answer on the Phala Phala scandal.
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Ramaphosa should do the honourable thing and immediately resign.
24% - 507 votes
Ramaphosa should follow due process and submit himself to an impeachment hearing.
33% - 677 votes
Ramaphosa should fight the findings in court and keep his job at all costs
43% - 887 votes
Vote
Rand - Dollar
17.46
+0.5%
Rand - Pound
21.25
+1.1%
Rand - Euro
18.24
+1.2%
Rand - Aus dollar
11.81
+1.2%
Rand - Yen
0.13
+0.7%
Gold
1,782.21
-1.2%
Silver
22.38
-1.6%
Palladium
1,876.90
-3.5%
Platinum
1,011.00
-3.2%
Brent Crude
86.88
-0.1%
Top 40
67,453
-2.1%
All Share
73,549
-2.0%
Resource 10
72,624
-4.4%
Industrial 25
90,714
-1.6%
Financial 15
15,351
+0.5%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE