Buck stops with Zuma on Nkandla - DA

Johannesburg - The buck stops with President Jacob Zuma over the Nkandla controversy, lawyer Anton Katz SC told the Constitutional Court on behalf of the DA on Tuesday.

"Ultimately the buck stops with the president," said Katz who followed the Economic Freedom Fighters' lawyer Wim Trengove's highly charged submissions that Zuma had violated the Constitution over the controversy.

"And the president takes responsibility for the conduct of state officials who blocked or attempted to block a constitutionally mandated body in this manner," Katz told the judges in the highest court in the land.

"All government respondents in this case are liable for this kind of blockage," he said.

Blame also fell on Parliament, he said, in reply to a question from the bench.

The DA is taking part in a massive court application, along with with the EFF, to clarify the powers of the public protector on the grounds of their belief that Zuma, some Cabinet ministers and the National Assembly had ignored the recommendations of Public Protector Thuli Madonsela's report Secure in Comfort.

"The National Assembly has a duty to consider the report of the public protector, and deal with it in a constitutionally proper manner, which they didn't," he said.

The application comes two days ahead of Zuma's State of the Nation Address, where organisers are on tenterhooks after EFF MPs were thrown out last year for shouting "pay back the money" at Zuma.

Katz said the National Assembly had a duty to act on the Public Protector's report. Instead, it had "rubber stamped a whitewash of the excess".

He said the public protector required the SA Police Services to deal with the issue of how much Zuma should pay back, not Minister of Police Nathi Nhleko.

The money spent on former presidents PW Botha, FW de Klerk, Nelson Mandela and Thabo Mbeki for presidential housing indicated "something more modest" than the Nkandla expenditure of around R246m.

The DA could not see how Nhleko or the National Assembly could decide that Zuma didn't need to pay back a cent.

"There has been an abuse of public resources on an extraordinary scale for the benefit of one family," he said.

The respondents in the case are Zuma, the Speaker of the National Assembly and the public protector. Corruption Watch is a Friend of the Court.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Lockdown For
Voting Booth
Have you decided who you are voting for on 1 November?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Yes, and it is the same party I voted for previously
51% - 1013 votes
Yes, but my vote has changed to a new party
29% - 564 votes
No, I am still undecided
20% - 401 votes
Rand - Dollar
Rand - Pound
Rand - Euro
Rand - Aus dollar
Rand - Yen
Brent Crude
Top 40
All Share
Resource 10
Industrial 25
Financial 15
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.