LETTER TO EDITOR

I read with dismay that our municipality is to address the road safety problem by installing more speed humps in the name of so- called traffic calming.

There are many negative aspects to installing speed humps and this should only be done as a last resort. As it is, we are already known as the speed hump capital of South Africa.

The negative points are: No warning signs which were either not installed or removed. Faded paint so that a motorist not familiar with the area fails to see the speed hump and damages his vehicle.

These speed humps should be maintained on a constant basis with fresh paint and proper warning signs.

The present humps are very severe and one needs to slow down to 20km/h to cross it without damage.

I know of a person who suffered spinal injuries because of this.

I have no problem with the pedestrian humps as they serve a purpose and are not so severe.

There may also be damage to the ozone layer because of vehicles having to slow down and accelerate.

May I suggest we lower the speed limit in suburban areas to 50km/h and provide strict law enforcement by having more traffic police vehicles and motorcycles on the road.

Arterial roads can still be at the 60km/h limit or as indicated by speed limit signs. More use can also be made by installing traffic roundabouts or mini-circles to control speeding vehicles.

Finally, our road markings are in a very poor state. Do we have to wait for the next elections before more road markings are done?

Concerned

W de Jong

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For 14 free days, you can have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today. Thereafter you will be billed R75 per month. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won't be billed. 
Subscribe to News24
Voting Booth
Eskom has considered continuous load shedding at Stage 2, instead of introducing it when the power system faces a crunch. What are your thoughts?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
I'm all for it - we're going to have power cuts regardless, so we might as well have some stability to better plan our lives
45% - 4261 votes
No thanks! I prefer having periods of no load shedding and we cannot normalise this crisis
55% - 5135 votes
Vote
Rand - Dollar
17.96
-2.0%
Rand - Pound
19.39
+0.3%
Rand - Euro
17.36
+0.0%
Rand - Aus dollar
11.70
+0.0%
Rand - Yen
0.12
+0.1%
Gold
1,643.40
-0.0%
Silver
18.87
0.0%
Palladium
2,073.00
0.0%
Platinum
858.50
0.0%
Brent Crude
86.15
-5.0%
Top 40
57,110
-3.1%
All Share
63,417
-2.9%
Resource 10
56,319
-7.5%
Industrial 25
78,436
-1.2%
Financial 15
14,142
-1.6%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE