Public Protector concerned about intimidation of whistleblowers at SAA

Cape Town – Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane on Friday afternoon expressed concern over allegations that South African Airways (SAA) was trying to intimidate employees who disclosed information about alleged corruption to her office. 

SAA, however, said that four employees were dismissed for “grossly inappropriate” comments on social media. 

In a statement, Mkhwebane’s spokesperson Cleopatra Mosana said the public protector received a complaint on July 23 from members of the South African Cabin Crew Association (SACCA) alleging that employees of SAA were being victimised.

"In the complaint, SACCA alleged to have submitted correspondence as evidence which was directed to SAA Executives, the Board of Directors and National Treasury wherein they raised issues relating to maladministration, corruption and tender irregularities," Mosana said.

"SACCA further submitted that SAA had allegedly charged their members in retaliation to them having made a protected disclosure."

Mosana said on July 25 Mkhwebane requested that SAA suspend the disciplinary hearings of the employees, pending an outcome of the preliminary investigations into the allegation of harassment. 

She said Mkhwebane had a meeting with SAA executives, including board chairperson Dudu Myeni, on Monday where it was agreed that SAA would not proceed with the disciplinary proceedings, pending the investigation. 

On Thursday, SACCA, however, informed the Public Protector that SAA continued with the disciplinary hearings.

Impugned reputation

SAA spokesperson Tlali Tlali denied that the state-owned company ever made commitments to halting the disciplinary action. 

He said the decision to discipline the employees stemmed from “inappropriate, derogatory, insolent comments” made on social media against certain managers at the state owned company. 

“Their conduct has impugned the reputation and dignity of these managers and has brought the company into disrepute,” Tlali told News24. 

“The decision to institute proceedings against them is not an act of victimization but of enforcement of policies in relation to code of conduct applicable to all employees.” 

He said SAA was willing to co-operate with the investigation of the public protector into any maladministration.

“In our view, the issues must be separated and be dealt with in accordance with appropriate legislative framework under distinct factual scenarios.” 

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For 14 free days, you can have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today. Thereafter you will be billed R75 per month. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won't be billed. 
Subscribe to News24
Voting Booth
Zama zama crackdown: What are your thoughts on West Village residents taking the law into their own hands?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Authorities should bring in the army already
10% - 1260 votes
Illegal miners can't be scapegoated for all crime
51% - 6409 votes
What else did we expect without no proper policing
35% - 4413 votes
Vigilante groups are also part of the problem
3% - 424 votes
Rand - Dollar
Rand - Pound
Rand - Euro
Rand - Aus dollar
Rand - Yen
Brent Crude
Top 40
All Share
Resource 10
Industrial 25
Financial 15
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.