Editorial: A case of truth or dare

2016-10-23 06:01

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan’s court application for a declaratory order allowing him, as a minister, to intervene in matters involving a bank and its client will provide South Africa with much-needed answers.

Since the country’s banks decided to cut ties with the Gupta family and their businesses earlier this year, theories have abounded to explain the banks’ collective action.

Did the family and its companies do something wrong? Or, did the banks conspire to cancel the accounts against the family, given the brothers’ proximity to President Jacob Zuma? All answers were mere speculation – until last Friday.

Gordhan’s application is essential for national clarity, especially after government instituted an interministerial team to engage the banks on their reasons for cancelling the family’s accounts.

This, in turn, begged the question about whether any South African could be treated in the same manner by government if their accounts were to be cancelled by banks.

Gordhan listed transactions amounting to R6.8 billion that were flagged by the Financial Intelligence Centre against the Gupta-owned empire.

The family hit back at Gordhan by releasing certain documents to prove that they had conducted business in a fair and proper manner, and that there was nothing sinister about said transactions.

Gordhan’s application coincided with the imminent release of then public protector Thuli Madonsela’s report on state capture, which investigated the alleged control of government by the Gupta family. This followed complaints that the family had offered several ministerial positions to politicians – a prerogative of the president – in return for favours.

Zuma, the Gupta family and Cooperative Governance Minister Des van Rooyen put a stop to Madonsela releasing the report by bringing an urgent court application, in which they demanded that they be afforded a chance to question the people who had given evidence to the Public Protector. That matter is also before the courts.

The Guptas, like any other person, have every right to defend themselves against any allegations.

But public bickering will not bring them relief. The court processes will give the family a chance to put forward their case regarding Gordhan’s application and the Public Protector’s report. Only then will we find out who is telling the truth.

Read more on:    pravin gordhan  |  thuli madon­sela  |  jacob zuma  |  guptas  |  politics

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.