Cell towers pose 'no risk'

2010-06-23 09:34

London - Children who live close to a mobile phone tower don't appear to be at any higher risk of cancer than those who don't live in the neighbourhood, a new study says.

British researchers analysed all 1 397 cancer cases in children up to age four from 1999 to 2001 in the UK.

They compared those children to 5 588 similar children who didn't get cancer. Next, they looked at how close the children lived to a mobile phone base station when they were born, as well as the expected amount of power produced by the closest tower.

Children who got cancer were living about 1 107 metres away from a mobile phone tower, whereas the children who didn't get cancer were living about 1 073 metres away. For children who got cancer, researchers estimated the nearest cellphone towers were emitting about 2.89kW of power, versus about 3kW from the towers close to children who did not become ill.

The study was paid for by an independent body set up to provide money for research into the health effects of mobile phones, funded by Britain's department of health and the mobile telecommunications industry.


Paul Elliott, the study's lead author, was a member of the body's programme management committee. The research was published online on Wednesday in the medical journal, BMJ.

"It's reassuring," said Elliott, a professor of epidemiology and public health medicine at Imperial College in London. "On the basis of our results, people living near mobile phone stations shouldn't consider moving based on health reasons."

Since the study was done, many more mobile phone towers were built in Britain with the arrival of 3G technology.

Exposure to radiofrequency from mobile phone towers is much lower than exposure to cellphones. Elliott and colleagues estimated that a day's exposure from a mobile phone tower equals about 30 minutes of cellphone use.

Even at these low levels of exposure, however, some experts have worried about the impact on children because of their small size and susceptibility to disease.

As cellphones have carpeted the globe and become essential to lifestyles from Africa to Asia to America, some have wondered if the devices might come with a hidden health cost.

In May, the results of a major study on cellphones and cancer were published, but offered no solid proof the phones cause cancer and the controversy continues to simmer.

No scientific evidence

Some experts said concerns about mobile phone towers have been driven mostly by people's own beliefs rather than science.

"People don't like these things towering over their gardens and every time they get a headache they think it's responsible," said John Bithell, an honorary research fellow at the Childhood Cancer Research Group at the University of Oxford.

"But there's no scientific evidence, not even in animals, to back this up." Bithell was not connected to the study and wrote an accompanying editorial in the BMJ.

He said it might be more important to study cancers in adults, because any health effects are likely to appear only after years of exposure to cellphones and their base towers.

Still, Bithell said any dangers of mobile phones causing cancer were dwarfed by more immediate dangers of using the devices. "What you do while using a mobile phone during driving is more dangerous than what the phone is doing to you," he said.

  • Joe - 2010-06-23 13:20

    What rubbish. Didn't people see the Carte Blanch episode where a tower was erected and subsequently fried a tree to death?? Now how can they tell me that radiation is not harmful? It's like living in a microwave!

  • Daemon@Joe - 2010-06-23 14:33

    There is no conclusive proof that cellphones cause bodily harm. Carte blance is not exactly authoritative!!

  • pages:
  • 1