News24

Climate goal needs 8.5% carbon cut

2011-10-24 09:17

Paris - Meeting the target for global warming enshrined in the 2009 Copenhagen Accord will require carbon emissions to decline by more than 8% by 2020 compared to 2010 and then continue their fall, a study said on Sunday.

World leaders at the ill-starred UN climate-change summit in Copenhagen in December 2009 set a goal of limiting warming to 2°C above pre-industrial levels.

The Copenhagen Accord does not set a timetable for reaching the objective and the national pledges of carbon cuts for achieving it are voluntary.

In a paper published online in the peer-reviewed journal Nature Climate Change, researchers led by Joeri Rogelj of the Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science at ETH Zurich in Switzerland, revisited computer models in the light of 2°C objective.

In scenarios that saw a "likely" - higher than 66% - chance of staying below 2°C, global emissions would have to peak between 2010 and 2020.

Greenhouse gases

By 2020, annual emissions would have to be 44 billion tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) or its equivalent (CO2e) per year.

This would amount to an 8.5% cut compared with 2010, when global emissions were 48 gigatones.

Emissions would have to keep falling thereafter.

"If the mechanisms needed to enable an early peak in global emissions followed by steep reductions are not put in place, there is a significant risk that the 2°C target will not be achieved," the paper warns.

CO2e is a measurement of all greenhouse gases, ranging from CO2 - emitted by the burning of fossil fuels - to methane, which comes from deforestation and agricultural processes.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) says that CO2-only emissions in 2010 were the highest in history, rebounding sharply after a dip in 2009 caused by the global financial crisis.

Intended to usher in a new global treaty on climate change, the December 2009 summit in the Danish capital nearly ended in a fiasco.

The Copenhagen Accord was drafted at the last minute by a small group of leaders.

It failed to win the endorsement of a plenary of 194-party UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), after it was attacked for being undemocratic, and green groups say its voluntary approach will not deliver the carbon cuts that are needed.

Scientists, meanwhile, are cautious about the 2°C target, saying it is not a guarantee of safety.

Many say there have already been perceptible changes to snow and ice cover, habitat and reproductive patterns by migrating species as a result of existing warming, of roughly 1°C since 1900.

Comments
  • robbie.crouch - 2011-10-24 09:57

    The world needs more CO2 to feed the poor.

  • wajmuller - 2011-10-24 10:13

    What a load of crap....

  • andynct - 2011-10-24 10:37

    8% decrease in global emissions requires about 40% decrease in US emissions by 2020. How likely is that? Absurd statements like this turn climate talks into a farce. 2°C cannot be reached. Deal with it and propose achievable goals.

  • badballie - 2011-10-24 11:09

    The entire debate on CO2 emissions and mans impact of the global warming / cooling cycle still has to be proved. There is currently no evidence that man has any effect on the process. this is just government propaganda to increase revenue while decreasing supply.

  • Paul - 2011-10-24 13:53

    occupywallstreet's list of demands does not include climate change because the scientists and the UN's IPCC are demanding "CO2 climate mitigation" in that we let the world banks fund corporate run CARBON TRADING MARKETS (ruled by politicians), manage the temperature of the planet Earth. However they "DO" stress we address the issues of energy and conservation of wildlife etc. but CO2 and climate change and greenhouse gasses are NOT mentioned. Finally, we have some responsible environmentalism. Check it out at: http://occupywallst.org/forum/proposed-list-of-demands-please-help-editadd-so-th/

  • dobermanmacleod - 2011-10-25 06:40

    There is a new clean energy technology that is 1/5th the cost of coal. Don’t believe me? Watch this video by a Nobel prize winner in physics: http://pesn.com/2011/06/23/9501856_Nobel_laureate_touts_E-Cat_cold_fusion/ Still don’t believe me? It convinced the Swedish Skeptics Society: http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3144827.ece LENR using nickel. Incredibly: Ni+H+K2CO3(heated under pressure)=Cu+lots of heat. Here is a detailed description of the device and formula from a US government contract: www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/GernertNnascenthyd.pdf According to Forbes, electricity will be "too cheap to meter" if the Oct 28 demonstration succeeds: http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2011/10/17/hello-cheap-energy-hello-brave-new-world/ By the way, here is a current survey of all the companies that are bringing LENR to commercialization: http://www.cleantechblog.com/2011/08/the-new-breed-of-energy-catalyzers-ready-for-commercialization.html

  • pages:
  • 1