Climate indaba deep into overtime

2011-12-10 11:27

Durban - Deep into overtime, negotiators from 194 nations worked straight through a second night, parsing drafts and seeking compromises to map out the future pathway to fight global warming.

Delegates, working on little sleep, huddled with allies to prepare for a decisive meeting later on Saturday, when it will become clear whether the diverse and long-bickering parties can come together on a plan to extend and broaden the global campaign to limit greenhouse gas emissions.

"We think it's important not to give up now. We have come a long way," said a weary Connie Hedegaard, the European commissioner on climate issues, speaking more than 12 hours after the two-week conference had been scheduled to close on Friday evening.

Small island countries and the world's poorest nations lined up behind an EU plan to begin talks on a future agreement that would come into effect no later than 2020.

As negotiations progressed, the United States and India eased objections to compromise texts, but China remained a strong holdout, EU officials said on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the continuing talks.

Under discussion was an extension of binding pledges by the EU and a few other industrial countries to cut carbon emissions under the Kyoto Protocol. Those commitments expire next year.

The EU, the primary bloc bound by commitments under the 1997 protocol, conditioned an extension on starting new talks on an accord to succeed Kyoto.

The talks would conclude by 2015, allowing five years for it to be ratified by national legislatures. The plan insists the new agreement equally oblige all countries - not just the few industrial powers - to abide by emission targets.

Developing countries are adamant that the Kyoto commitments continue since it is the only agreement that compels any nation to reduce emissions.


Industrial countries say the document is deeply flawed because it makes no demands on heavily polluting developing countries. It was for that reason that the United States never ratified it.

Host country South Africa organised the final stages of negotiations into "indabas", a Zulu-language word meaning important meetings that carries the weight of a rich African culture.

At the indaba, the chief delegate from fewer than 30 countries, each with one aide, sat around an oblong table to thrash over text.

Dozens of delegates were allowed to stand and observe from the periphery of the room but not to participate.

After the first meeting that ran overnight into Friday morning, conference president Maite Nkoana-Mashabane, drafted an eight-point compromise on the key question of the legal form of a post-2020 regime. The wording would imply how tightly countries would be held accountable for their emissions.

But the text was too soft for the Europeans and for the most vulnerable countries threatened by rising oceans, more frequent droughts and fiercer storms.

With passion rarely heard in a negotiating room, countries like Barbados pleaded for language instructing all parties to dig deeper into their carbon emissions and to speed up the process, arguing that the survival of their countries and millions of climate-stressed people were at risk.

Nkoana-Mashabane drafted new text after midnight on Saturday that largely answered those criticisms.

The US told the indaba it could live with the language, but the reactions of China and India were not clear.

  • Terrence - 2011-12-10 12:10

    Rising sea levels ? - Natural erosion , nature takes it course. I hate cold winters,love global warming

  • Geronimo - 2011-12-10 12:17

    Screw you China! I wouldn't your breath for any substantive or meaningful agreement though, humans are far to too selfish for that.

  • Derek - 2011-12-10 12:23

    So the best we can expect from COP17 is that we agree to wait until 2020?? That's tragic and a slap in the face for our mother, earth. And disgusting that the worlds so called "super power", the one most responsible for global environmental degradation, and pollution, refuses to acknowledge guilt or offer the lead to any solution. Your greed and mindless consumption is threating our very exisitance. Be ashamed, be very ashamed!!

  • Boeretroos - 2011-12-10 12:27

    This is just an excuse for some countries to palm in easy cash. The north americans will not fall for this. Forgetaboutit ! The fact thet Azania is hosting this is a joke as well !

      Larry - 2011-12-10 12:48

      Too true, but the extra days in Durban at taxpayers expense was not to be missed. They will spend the extra time working out where they will go next year.

      Kate - 2011-12-10 13:00

      Even that they will debate for days Larry

  • neil.purves - 2011-12-10 12:57

    parsing English must have been a concern!

  • Alan - 2011-12-10 13:52

    'Indabas' 'carries (sic) the weight of a rich African culture'. What 'noble savage' romanticism. Shaka, Cetewayo, Dingaan, never known for a shred of liberalism, let alone democracy. In fact, we need a Shaka to push through an extension to Kyoto, not yet another bloody indaba.

  • Jakes - 2011-12-10 19:09

    Non existent problems do not have any solutions. No surprise here!

      Derek - 2011-12-10 20:23

      You're a sad case Jakes, you saying that the environment that sustains you is non exisitent??? Better pull your head out of the sand before mother nature screws you in the ass!

  • pages:
  • 1