Consumption, population rethink urged

2012-04-26 07:29

London - Scientists have called for a radical rethink of our relationship with the planet to head off what they warn could be economic and environmental catastrophe.

In a report published on Thursday by the London-based Royal Society, an international group of 23 scientists chaired by Nobel laureate Sir John Sulston called for a rebalancing of consumption in favour of poor countries coupled with increased efforts to control population growth to lift the estimated 1.3 billion people living on less than $1.25 a day out of poverty.

"Over the next 30 - 40 years the confluence of the challenges described in this report provides the opportunity to move toward a sustainable economy and a better world for the majority of humanity, or alternatively the risk of social, economic and environmental failures and catastrophes on a scale never imagined," the scientists said.

The 133-page report, which Sulston describes as a summary of work done over the last two years, comes against a backdrop of austerity-hit governments reducing subsidies for renewable energy, global car companies falling over themselves to meet demand for new cars in rapidly growing economies like China and Brazil, and increasing pressure to exploit vast reserves of gas locked in rocks around the globe through the controversial process known as "fracking".

But the scientists insist the goals in the report are realistic. They argue lifestyle choices, human volition and incentives enshrined in government policy can make a significant difference to patterns of consumption.


They cite the growing appetite for recycling in the developed world, Britain's policy-driven switch to lead-free fuel in the 1980s, and the seemingly prosaic example of air traffic control as examples of where international co-operation can work.

Sulston said governments realised quickly that the consequences of not managing air traffic could be catastrophic: "They said 'This is dangerous; we've got to co-operate.'"

The scientists say developed and emerging economies should stabilise and then start reducing their consumption of materials by increased efficiency, waste reduction and more investment in sustainable resources.

Carbon dioxide emissions are 10 to 50 times higher in rich countries compared to poor nations, they say. Rising greenhouse gas emissions are almost certainly responsible for increasing global average temperatures, leading to rising sea levels and more extreme weather, climate scientists say.

Voluntary programmes to reduce birth rates, education for young women and better access to contraception urgently need political leadership and financial support.

Professor Sarah Harper of Oxford University, another of the authors, said the issue of population had fallen off the development agenda in the last 10 - 15 years but it should be reinstated and coupled closely with environmental challenges, starting at the Rio+20 UN Conference on Sustainable Development to be held in Rio in June.

The trend to urbanisation remains intact. Some 50% of the world's population, which surpassed seven billion in 2011, lives in cities. The world's population is forecast to rise to 10 billion before flattening off and the urban proportion is forecast to increase to 75% by the end of the century.


Eliya Msiyaphazi Zulu, a report author and Executive Director of the African Institute for Development Policy research group, said the need for education about family planning and improved access to contraception was most acute in Africa, which is forecast to contribute 70% of the average population growth.

He said all the evidence points to African women wanting fewer children and argued the main reason for high fertility in a country like Niger was the fact that half of all women are married at the age of 16.

The scientists also supported growing calls for a revision in how we measure economic growth.

"We are extremely wedded to the idea that GDP increases are a good thing," said Jules Pretty, Professor of Environment and Society at the University of Essex and another of the authors.

He argued that GDP measures many of the "bads" in terms of the well-being of the planet as well as the "goods", adding: "There is an urgent need for policy change."

The scientists present some startling statistics. A child from the developed world consumes 30 - 50 times as much water as one from the developing world. Global average consumption of calories increased about 15% between 1969 and 2005, but in 2010 almost one billion people did not get their minimum calorie needs.

Minerals production rocketed in the 47 years up to 2007; copper, lead and lithium about fourfold and tantalum/niobium, used in electronic gadgets, by about 77 times.


For developed countries, Sulston said the message of the report boils down to something quite simple: "You don't have to be consuming as much to have a healthy and happy life".

But will politicians and consumers respond?

"It is a brave politician who is prepared to tell Western consumers to consume less to let the developing world consume more," said Tim Lang, Professor of Food Policy at City University in London. "But we need such bravery now, urgently."

Lang, who was not involved in the study, welcomed it saying: "The West over- and mal-consumes its way to diet-related ill-health from a diet with a high environmental impact. The evidence is there but will politicians and consumers listen and change?"

  • arne.verhoef - 2012-04-26 08:34


  • Felix - 2012-04-26 08:53

    Going to be hard to stop the mega corporations that are running things though.

  • Patrick - 2012-04-26 09:06

    If you cannot afford to feed, don't breed!

  • zaatheist - 2012-04-26 09:42

    The Catholic Church, and the other churches and religions opposed to contraception and abortion, do not support initiative because they want people in the World to choke in their own excrement.

      Tony Lapson - 2012-04-26 10:51

      Um yeah... Don't know of you have noticed, but it isn't the Catholics and Christians who have multiple wives and children anymore.

      zaatheist - 2012-04-26 11:47

      @Tony Perhaps not but then they are just ignoring the geriatric virgins in dresses and using contraception anyway. My point is that these religious clowns are promoting the non-use of contraception amongst the poorest and least educated populations on the planet.

  • ludlowdj - 2012-04-26 12:13

    World population will never be controlled. Current capitalist philosopy is simple, the more people there are the more demand there is for products and the higher the profit margin due to demand and supply. reduced populations mean overstocking of commodities, lower pricing, lower profits and lower demand, and you idiots still believe there is anyone out there that gives a toss about you, your predicaments or your welfare.....LOL

  • stenette - 2012-04-26 13:23

    The problem is not necessarily the NUMBER of children people are having, but the footprint of each individual. A Western family with one or two kids has a far larger footprint than a rural African family with 5 kids. It's simple. We consume too much.

      zaatheist - 2012-04-26 15:26

      But we all produce the same amounts of excrement.

  • pages:
  • 1