Japan firms want nuclear power exit

2012-08-27 12:30

Tokyo - About one in five big Japanese firms wants to see the share of nuclear power in the electricity supply reduced to zero by 2030, a Reuters poll showed, amid a growing anti-nuclear clamour after last year's Fukushima atomic disaster.

But underlining concerns about a rise in energy costs without atomic power, the rest of the respondents supported a continued role for nuclear energy, with the biggest group opting for a share of 15%.

The poll comes as Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda considers options for a medium-term energy plan while vowing to reduce reliance on atomic energy without saying by how much or when.

Energy policy has become a major headache for Noda and his Democratic Party of Japan, its ratings battered ahead of a general election likely to take place in November and give the ruling party a drubbing.

The government is considering three options for its energy portfolio: Reduce nuclear power's role to zero as soon as possible, aim at 15% by 2030, or seek a 20% - 25% share by the same date.

Energy costs

The share was about 30% before the disaster, which forced the government to scrap a 2010 plan to boost nuclear power's share to more than half of electricity needs by 2030.

In the poll, 19% of big firms sought to cut nuclear power's role to zero, but 39% called for 15% by 2030, as a majority of companies brace for slower economic growth as reliance on nuclear energy declines.

One quarter said they wanted to see a 20% - 25% share and the remainder called for even greater percentages, according to the poll of 400 big firms, taken alongside the monthly Reuters Tankan business sentiment survey. A total of 268 responded during the survey period from 6 - 21 August.

The poll reflects to some extent the stance of Japan's major business lobby, Keidanren, which advocates the need for nuclear power out of concern that high energy costs could force firms to move overseas, costing jobs and growth.

"It's unrealistic for Japan to ditch nuclear power in 15 years or so," one rubber company said in the survey. "It should inevitably become around 15% while we seek alternative energy sources for overage reactors."

The poll compared with a government survey of nearly 300 people which showed almost half - by far the largest group - favoured the zero option.

Meltdowns at the Fukushima nuclear plant after the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami caused radiation to spew over large areas, forcing more than 160 0000 people to flee. In the following months, all of Japan's remaining reactors were shut for safety checks. Two reactors resumed operations in July.


The poll found 85% seeking more strict safety standards and measures for restarting the rest of the reactors which remain shut, mostly for safety checks.

To cope with increased electricity costs amid a prolonged shutdown of reactors, 69% said they would cut expenditure and 36% would seek cheaper power suppliers, according to the poll, which allowed respondents multiple choices.

Underlining conditions of prolonged deflation, 26% said they would pass the cost on to their customers, while 13% would shift operations out of Japan, according to the poll.

Since last year's disaster, 15% of firms have boosted in-house power generation, while 80% made no change in their power procurement, the poll showed.

  • jpstrauss - 2012-08-27 13:01

    Just one thing, why would the placards be in english? japan is a very proud homogenous and nationalistic nation. My spidey-sense tells me that they would display slogans written in their own language, using their own idiograms. This reeks of green economic terrorism.

  • Robert - 2012-08-27 16:42

    It appears the socio-environmental impact of nuclear disasters may override the economic considerations which normally have the casting vote and it will be good to see common sense prevail. Japan has experienced enough horror as a result of recent the Fukushima nuclear plant fallout disaster but has also experienced radiation devastation created by the two nuclear attacks that ended their expansionist campaign in 1945. Renewables are the answer albeit expensive at present but if enough funding is placed in the direction of research we can overcome this obstacle thereby providing a safer and environmentally friendly energy source for future generations to enjoy. I hope the SA Government will take serious note of the outcome here. Enough money has already been spent on the proposed but outdated nuclear power stations destined for our country.

  • pages:
  • 1