Can trustee evade responsibility?

2018-05-23 06:00
Mulalo Muthelo

Mulalo Muthelo

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories


My beach house is for sale.

A few weeks ago, I received an offer from a trustee on behalf of a property investment trust.

I accepted the offer and the deed of sale was sent to the transferring attorneys.

They have now called me and indicated that the investment trust claims that the trustee was not authorised to make the offer and that the trust is accordingly not bound to the offer.

Can the trustee and trust just evade responsibility like this?


The authority of a trustee to act on behalf of a trust is confirmed by the letters of authority issued to a trustee by the Master of the High Court.

The power of the trustee to act is derived generally from the Trust Property Control Act 57 of 1988 and specifically from the trust deed of the trust, which has been registered with the Master.

A trust deed will usually set out the identity of the trustees as well as their powers, duties and functions, including specifying what may and may not be done by the trustee(s).

In addition, it would be expected that the trust deed also set out the formalities to be complied with by trustees when they act on behalf of the trust.

An overarching responsibility of the trustees is to act only within the scope of the general or specific objectives of the trust.

When it comes to a commercial transaction, such as the purchase of property as in your case, it must firstly be determined whether the trust deed allows such transactions.

If it does, then it must be determined what the formalities are for the taking of decisions in respect of such transactions and whether decisions taken have met the required formalities to be valid.

The consequence of decisions taken contrary to the objectives of the trust or without complying with the right formalities, is potential invalidity of the decision.

In your situation, if certain formalities such as a specific resolution by the trustees authorising a specific trustee to make the offer was required and not done, then potentially the trust could not be bound by the offer made by the trustee.

This does not mean that the trustee that claimed to have been authorised can get away scot-free. If he warranted in the sale agreement that he had the necessary authority, you could sue the trustee personally for damages arising from the trustee’s misrepresentation or breach of warranty.

Given the complexity and the necessity to carefully evaluate the claim of the trust that the necessary authority did not exist, it is our recommendation that you consult with your attorney to review the trust deed and advise you on your remedies and recourse against the trust and/or trustee.

– Mulalo Muthelo, associate, Phatshoane Henney Attorneys


Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.