Strikers must obey the court

2017-11-08 06:01
Tata Mokwayi

Tata Mokwayi

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories


A unionised grouping of my employees obtained a certificate to go on a protected strike.

However, several of my non-striking employees have been intimidated and the striking workers have blockaded my work entrances and damaged my fences and trucks.

I have asked the union to put a stop to this conduct by their members, but nothing has happened.

I recognise the right of the employees to strike, but surely they cannot be allowed to cause such damage?


You are correct in that even though employees are on a protected strike, unions and their striking members are not allowed to intimidate, act violently or cause damage or take part in other unlawful conduct while striking.

To curb such conduct, employers can approach the Labour Court for an interdict to stop the unlawful conduct of the striking employees.

When striking employees and their unions ignore such an interdict, the employer can file an application for contempt of court with the Labour Court against the trade union and the striking employees who fail to adhere to the terms of the interdict.

In a recent decision by the Labour Court, the court held both the trade union and individual striking employees in contempt of court for failing to adhere to the court order.

The court had granted an interdict against the union and striking employees after the striking employees forcefully removed non-striking employees from the site and intimidated them and subcontractors against coming to work and blockaded access to the employer’s worksite.

Despite the interdict, the striking workers continued to intimidate non-striking workers and subcontractors and prevented them from accessing the worksite.

The employer then approached the court for an order of contempt of court against the union and striking workers.

In dealing with the contempt application, the court was satisfied that the order had been served on the trade union and individual striking employees and that they all understood the contents of the order, which they had breached through their continued conduct.

The court also found that the trade union had failed to comply with its obligations in the interdict, as it could have done a lot more to avert the violence and unlawful conduct of the striking employees.

The court imposed a fine of R1 million against the trade union, suspended for three years, and each striking employee was ordered to pay a fine of R1 000, which the employer was entitled to deduct from their salaries.

This verdict sends a strong message about the importance of adhering to orders of court and also that trade unions are responsible for taking reasonable steps to stop their members from resorting to unlawful conduct, violence and intimidation during strike action.

– Tata Mokwayi, associate, Phatshoane Henney Attorneys


Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.