Time to end the Eskom monopoly

2017-08-22 06:00

WHAT is the fundamental difference between a state-supported monopoly and a monopoly that develops in the market?

The former has the state using taxes to shore up its failures and is protected by legislation preventing others from competing with it. The latter is a business that has gained monopoly status because it competed with others by offering better services and products. When an entity is protected by legislation, it becomes a monopoly. If a private company manages to attain a dominant position in the market, it is because that company has offered better products and services than its competitors — a monopoly can only be described as such if it is backed by force.

Eskom’s latest annual financial statements record irregular expenditure of almost R3 billion. The auditor’s opinion points out “reportable irregularities”, i.e. fraud, and that Eskom’s procurement processes do not meet legal requirements. Irregular compensation funds, shady tender processes and the link between the company’s financial director, Anoj Singh, to the Gupta family, are all part and parcel of the Eskom story. Furthermore, Eskom’s long-term debt is now R336,8 billion — South African taxpayers are going to have to foot this bill along with every other tax imposed on them. This rightly outrages us, but nothing will change if we do not end Eskom’s iron grip on the energy industry, with its state backing and continued taxpayer-funded bailouts.

Instead of expecting Eskom to continue to generate 95% of the country’s power, South Africa needs a competitive energy market.

The market must be opened up so that independent power producers can compete with each other for customers’ money. Whichever producer is the most reliable and offers the best service at the best price will gain the most customers. Those who fail to do so will have to close with zero government bailouts for failures.

Take energy generation, for example. If private companies were sure that the government would not interfere, they would feel secure enough to invest their own capital into modern and reliable generating plants. Private companies could both fund and operate these plants, and thereby create jobs. Those who offer the best packages will attract the best workers.

A decentralised energy market would encourage competition in every possible part of the system: electricity would be priced according to demand and supply, efficiency would increase as suppliers gained clearer knowledge of high and low-demand hours, and consumers would have a choice of suppliers.

Because private companies would be investing their own money, they would have increased incentive to build the best possible generating plants and distribution networks. With no government guarantees or bailouts, these private companies, in competition with others, would have to do their best to gain customers by offering competitive prices and efficient service.

The price of electricity needs to be linked to the people who pay for the resource — South Africans — not government bureaucrats who simply decree a price and then pay their own salaries as they see fit.

The trend around the world is towards less government control. The South African government could be at the forefront by setting the rules for a competitive energy market and then stepping back, allowing South Africans to forge the way ahead.

No one person has all the necessary knowledge to run an industry, never mind one as complex and important as energy supply and generation.

As the economist Friedrich Hayek said, no system can be as effective as one in which competing suppliers vie to meet the needs and wants of consumers.

It is crucial for the beleaguered SA economy that we have sufficient energy supply and generation capacity — we simply cannot run at a deficit and expect to create jobs.

The world is moving towards green energy, but whether it is coal, gas, wind turbines or solar, we need as much energy as possible.

And the best way to get more people using sustainable energy is to offer reliable and cheap sources, as only a competitive energy market would be able to do. — FMF.

• Chris Hattingh is a researcher at the Free Market Foundation.


Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.