Bonette social media ruling analysed

2012-11-22 22:26
Ina Bonette (Picture: Sapa)

Ina Bonette (Picture: Sapa)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Johannesburg - The justice department has commended a ruling that social media may not be used during Ina Bonette's testimony and cross-examination in the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria.

"We are encouraged by the stance adopted by the presiding officer as it entrenches our strong view that witnesses in sexual violence cases need to be protected from secondary trauma," justice spokesperson Mthunzi Mhaga said on Thursday.

This followed acting Judge Bert Bam's order on Tuesday which set the conditions for Bonette's in camera testimony during the trial of her husband Johan Kotzé and his co-accused Andries Sithole, Pieta Mohlane and Frans Mphaka.
They are accused of murdering her son Conrad, and kidnapping, repeatedly raping, assaulting and attempting to murder her on 3 January.

Restricted access

When testimony is held in camera, access to the courtroom is restricted.

Courts usually order these conditions if a minor is involved, or if there has been sexual violence.

Bonette consented to being photographed and interviewed in articles in You, Beeld and Huisgenoot, so her name has been published.

Bam's conditions limited the number of supporters she may have with her in the court, and the number of journalists who may be present.

The order, in terms of sections 153 (3A) and 154(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act (CPA), specified the closest distance that photographers and reporters could be to her.

It also stipulated that no social network reports in connection with what is testified in court, either from inside the court, or elsewhere, may be sent until the end of her testimony. This includes her cross-examination.
Generic tweets

Eye Witness News' Editor-in-Chief Katy Katopodis said: "We certainly wouldn't want to go against that ruling in any way."

Since the order, their reporter had tweeted generic information, such as whether the court had broken for lunch, whether the case had resumed, and some observations outside the court.

"Certainly, none about the testimony, or the content," she said.

The content itself had been so graphic and gruesome that the order in this particular case seemed to make sense, she said.

However, because it was precedent-setting in South Africa, the issue had to be properly debated.

Worldwide problem

Mhaga said social media was a relatively new phenomenon, hence no specific legislation governed how it could be used to give updates on court proceedings.

The courts currently used section 153 of the CPA to protect witnesses and any information or evidence, the publication of which could undermine the proper administration of justice.

Rosalind Davey, a lawyer at Bowman Gilfillan with a knowledge of social media issues, said courts in the United States and the United Kingdom were also grappling with this.

News reports there showed that tweeting had been variously allowed only by accredited journalists and lawyers.

Orders had been handed down limiting tweeting in US courts on the grounds that jurors might be influenced.

In the UK, the lord chief justice was worried that witnesses in criminal trials could know was happening in court, and be coached before giving evidence.

Davey said: "The judge retains the discretion to prevent it."


She said that in Bonette's case, the judge was probably weighing up the right to freedom of speech versus Bonette's privacy and dignity rights.

She said the use of pseudonyms could make policing such orders difficult, but in the US, courts had ordered service providers to release information on account holders.

She said in South Africa, information posted on social media, such as Facebook, had already become part of the discovery process that preceded a court case.

"If evidence on social media is relevant to a case it is discoverable," she said, referring to the collection and preparation of documents and evidence to support a case.

Time period limit

Raymond Louw, of the Freedom of Expression Institute, said it was important to note that Bam's order was not a total ban.

"It only limits the time period when social media may be used in court," he said.

That the media was allowed into the court to report on the proceedings meant that freedom of the press was not interfered with.

He said tweeting during such a case could be considered as providing only a portion of the evidence, without the balance and fairness that would go into a fuller news report.

"It goes straight from the tweeter and onto the screen," said Louw.

Clarity needed

The issue required greater clarity, and a discussion between judges and the press on how to deal with it, said Louw.

The last discussion on terms of coverage was ahead of the Farlam Commission of Inquiry into the shootings at Marikana.

Violating an order relating to coverage of a case could lead to a contempt charge, according to "Reporting the Courts, A handbook for South African journalists".

A person found guilty of contempt could be fined or imprisoned, depending on the presiding officer.

Read more on:    ina bonette  |  johan kotze  |  social networks

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.
NEXT ON NEWS24X publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Competition regulation for a growing and inclusive economy

ADVERTORIAL: The Competition Commission of South Africa is conducting advocacy work in the South African automotive aftermarket industry and has gazetted a Draft Code of Conduct for public comment.

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.