ConCourt to hear Bapsfontein relocation case

2014-08-12 07:19

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Johannesburg - The Constitutional Court will on Tuesday hear arguments on why the Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality should be found in contempt of court for not complying with a court order.

Friend of the court, the Socio-Economic Rights Institute of SA, contends that the municipality should be found in contempt of court.

It also contends that the mayor and municipal manager should be joined in the proceedings and that the mayor and municipal manager should explain why the municipality has failed to comply with the order.

On 6 December 2011, the Constitutional Court held that the municipality had unlawfully evicted and relocated the occupiers of Bapsfontein informal settlement.

The court ordered the municipality to find land in the Bapsfontein area for the applicants, the meaningfully engage with the applicants when alternative land was found and to report to the court detailing the steps taken.

Before the first report was filed by the municipality, the applicants split into two groups, the Mayfield community and the N12 Highway Park community.

The Mayfield community was unhappy with the findings of the report because they wanted to be as close as possible to their original location.

However, the N12 community was satisfied and ready to be relocated.

In December 2012, an agreement on the relocation of the N12 community was reached, but they have not been relocated yet.

Address changed

On 21 November 2013, the Constitutional Court issued directions that the municipality file a second report on the progress of the relocation of the N12 community. However, the municipality did not comply.

In March this year, the court ordered the municipality to submit a progress report by 14 April , but no response was received.

The court issued further directions to the municipality to show cause as the why it should not be found in contempt of court, on 15 May.

In court papers, the municipality submitted that it could not relocate the N12 community without further directions from the court ordering it to do so.

It said that it was not able to respond to the court order and directions because it did not receive them when its attorney's fax number and e-mail address changed.

The case will be heard at 10:00.

Read more on:    constitutional court  |  johannesburg  |  local government  |  land

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.
NEXT ON NEWS24X publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
1 comment
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.