E-toll talks to continue

2012-10-05 20:49

Johannesburg - A meeting between the inter-ministerial committee on e-tolling and Cosatu, chaired by Deputy President Kgalema Motlanthe, will again convene next week.

"The meeting [on Friday] agreed that more time was needed for both parties to consider the proposals on the table," Motlanthe's spokesperson Thabo Masebe said in a statement.

Motlanthe and Congress of SA Trade Unions (Cosatu) president Sidumo Dlamini led the government and labour delegations respectively at the meeting at the Union Buildings in Pretoria.

This followed a 20 July consultation.

The IMC had been expected to announce its plans on Friday for implementing e-tolling in Gauteng.

However, Masebe said this would be delayed because the IMC needed time to discuss the issues raised.


Cosatu has mounted a strong campaign against e-tolling, maintaining it is the wrong way to raise money to maintain the country's major roads.

Government's plans to introduce e-tolling in Gauteng have provoked opposition by motorists and residents of South Africa's economic heartland.

Earlier, the Opposition to Urban Tolling Alliance (Outa) said it was clear government intended to launch e-tolling in Gauteng before a court review took place.

This was judging from the comments made by the transport minister urging the public to buy e-tags this week, it said in a statement.

Outa chairperson Wayne Duvenage said: "Since having access to the ETC [electronic toll collection] contract... our expert transport economist’s assessment of the numbers and efficiency of e-tolls has revealed that the plan suffers from oversights and is a most inefficient manner in which to fund the R17bn freeway upgrade."

Charming public

Outa was expecting the IMC to announce it was reducing the e-toll tariff and the capped maximum charge.

"They [will] go on the charm offensive to woo the public into believing this is the best option. We also believe their announcement will include the acceptance of e-tolling by a few entities that were originally opposed to the plan," said Duvenage.

Outa rejected e-tolling under the "user-pays" principle.

"The reality, however, is that you can’t be 'half-pregnant' on e-tolls. You either e-toll or you don’t."

Footing the bill

Cliff Johnston of the SA National Consumer Union said the collection costs and the burden placed on society were independent from the amount charged per kilometre.

"Indeed, as the toll rate per kilometre falls, the collection costs become an increasingly larger percentage of the amount collected. This is the ultimate tragedy of the plan," he said.

Road users would still have to foot the bill of more than R1.1bn per annum just to cover the electronic toll collection process.

Automobile Association spokesperson Gary Ronald said it was worrying that the ETC contracts remained confidential. They should be made public for the citizens who would be paying the toll fees.

Michael Tatalias, CEO of the SA Tourism Services Association, said forcing e-tolling on citizens was a gross injustice.


Ari Seiris, CEO of the QuadPara Association of SA, said it was concerning that its members were not consulted during the e-toll planning.

"While a solution is currently being sought for people with disabilities, the last proposed tariff structure and policy makes no accommodation for those without transport but who rely on the generosity of many private individuals to transport them around Gauteng, often using the network of highways," said Seiris.

The Justice Project SA said it supported Outa.

"JPSA... remains vehemently opposed to this ludicrously costly and inefficient way of collecting funding and paying for infrastructure in our country, effectively privatising public roads and enriching Austrian-based Kapsch TrafficCom," chairperson Howard Dembovsky said in a statement.

There was a risk that the e-toll fees could escalate out of control as had happened with other state-owned enterprises, such as Eskom, he said.

  • mc.segal.5 - 2012-10-06 07:00

    How about us the Public????

  • linley.dewey - 2012-10-06 15:07

    we've paid tolls for years and no-one seemed to notice. it should have been stopped then

      konstabel.koekemoer - 2012-10-09 15:37

      I fully agree. Once e-tolling has been stopped we need to put pressure on government not to renew any of the other toll contracts. We are just making companies like Tollcon rich. Look at the toll road between Swartruggens and Zeerust, it is such a bumpy road that it is sometimes dangerous to travel at speed limits with a 4x4 vehicle. The only maintenance that road has seen in years is a couple of patches on potholes yet it costs R71. Taxis doing a round trip between these two towns have to fork out R152 ... so commuters have who live in one city and work in the other have to cover R9.50 in toll fees each. And there is no alternative, to drive around the toll gate will more than triple the distance between these towns. It is digusting abuse by the Bakwena and the minister of transport has approved this abuse.

  • Penisphant - 2012-10-07 13:25

    Put the tolls in durban(between maritzburg and durbs). We will show Gauteng how its done, we will rip them off.

  • nugesh.govindasamy - 2012-10-08 15:19

    the e tolling system is a rip off we as tax payers already contribute a arm and a leg now another scheme one that the public knew nothing about is about to dig a whole in our pockets

  • pages:
  • 1