Idea of 'merit' offensive - Smuts

2013-04-21 14:20
(Picture: <a href=\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\


Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Johannesburg - Former Judicial Service Commission (JSC) official Izak Smuts has suggested that the idea of merit when it comes to making judicial appointments is "offensive", it was reported on Sunday.

"The term 'merit' is undefined, just as the term 'transformation' is undefined," Smuts, who resigned as a JSC commissioner last week amid disagreement about the transformation of the Bench, told the Sunday Times. "I think the term 'merit' is offensive," he said.

Constitutional values

Smuts reportedly said the justice system needed people who embraced constitutional values.

"If you adopt the approach that transformation is simply a rote replacement of white male judges with black and female judges, but you don't examine whether those you appoint embrace the constitutional values..., then on the race and gender model you may be transforming the judiciary, but in reality you may be posing far greater dangers to our new society."

Smuts, who was appointed to represent the advocates' profession in 2009, resigned amid controversy about a discussion document he wrote criticising the way in which the JSC overlooked white men for judicial appointments.

On Sunday, Smuts was quoted as saying the litmus test for judicial appointments was to ask: "Are you going to be a judge giving effect to our new constitutional dispensation, or are you going to be an obstacle?"

"Being black or female or white or green or whatever isn't the test," he told the Sunday Times.

Earlier in the week, JSC spokesperson Dumisa Ntsebeza told SAfm that Smuts had made the right decision by resigning if he did not agree with what the institution was doing.

"If you find the institution to which you belong is doing things in a way that is so untenable, then the best thing for you is to leave that institution".

Read more on:    jsc  |  izak smuts  |  judiciary

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.
NEXT ON NEWS24X publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.