JMPD complies with Madonsela's report

2015-03-19 13:10
JMPD traffic cops (File)

JMPD traffic cops (File)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Johannesburg - The Johannesburg Metropolitan Police Department (JMPD) on Thursday said it had complied with the public protector's proposed remedial action for issuing infringement notices via ordinary mail instead of registered mail.

"JMPD has subsequently placed an apology in eight mainstream newspapers circulating in Johannesburg," Director Gerrie Gernicke told reporters in Johannesburg.

On 18 December, Public Protector Thuli Madonsela said in a report the JMPD acted improperly when it sent fines by ordinary post instead of registered mail.

The fines, sent by metro police for the period August 2010 to 21 December 2012, did not comply with the Administrative Adjudication of Road Traffic Offences (Aarto) Act, Madonsela said in her report.

"The acts of the JMPD accordingly constitute improper conduct and maladministration," she said at the time.

Complaints lodged in 2010

Madonsela's report, "A Matter of Interpretation", followed complaints lodged in July 2010 and in June 2011.

The public protector recommended that the metro police chief, in consultation with the city manager, issue a formal apology to be printed in all newspapers in circulation in Johannesburg.
Gernicke apologised to the public.

"JMPD accordingly apologises to the public for issuing Aarto infringement notices by ordinary post instead of registered mail in contravention of section 30," he said.

"I can assure the public that since 22 December 2012, all such notices are being issued via registered mail at a cost of R10m per month."

The apology adverts would appear in newspapers from the week of 23 March.

Gernicke said the adverts cost over R200 000.

Proof of guilt

The JMPD would give Madonsela a final update on Friday to indicate that it had complied with her recommendations.

Gernicke said members of the public who had paid fines received by ordinary mail were not entitled to a refund.

"Once you've paid a fine you have pleaded guilty... the public protector made it clear that once you've pleaded guilty you can't apply for a refund.

"Paying was proof enough that the fine was received."

Those who had not paid fines received by ordinary mail could plead their fines in terms of section 30 of the Aarto act, Gernicke said.

Read more on:    jmpd  |  thuli madonsela  |  johannesburg

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.
NEXT ON NEWS24X publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.