Judge Masipa made errors in law - Nel

2015-11-03 11:35
Prosecutor Gerrie Nel. (Siphiwe Sibeko, AFP)

Prosecutor Gerrie Nel. (Siphiwe Sibeko, AFP)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories


Watch Masipa sentence Pistorius to five years in prison

2014-10-21 11:44

Judge Thokozile Masipa handed down a sentence of five years in prison for Oscar Pistorius's culpable homicide charge. Watch Masipa hand down her ruling here.WATCH

Bloemfontein - Questions were on Tuesday raised in the Supreme Court of Appeal over how Pretoria High Court Judge Thokozile Masipa dealt with the evidence in Oscar Pistorius’s trial.

Gerrie Nel, for the State, argued she had not looked at the circumstantial evidence holistically and had instead paid “lip service” in her judgment.

“The court never went back to discuss the circumstantial evidence of what happened in the bedroom,” he said.

“The court failed to take into account what happened just before [the shooting] and that is the most important aspect of this trial.”

Five SCA judges were hearing the State’s appeal of his culpable homicide conviction.

Judge Steven Majiedt raised a concern.

“What I find more troubling is how she dealt with [police ballistics expert Chris] Mangena’s evidence. You don’t understand how she gets to where she does in that she basically accepts what the accused says: if he wanted to kill, he would have shot higher. That is completely contradictory to his evidence.”

- WATCH LIVE: State appeals Oscar Pistorius's conviction

‘On facts, the conviction is murder’

Nel said the court accepted what Pistorius had testified about his thinking, actions and motives at the time.

This was not in line with the trial court’s finding of his credibility, he said.

He believed the court had allowed multiple defences.

“The one [defence] he elected to use, the court rejected that and gave him another one.”

“The court should have rejected his evidence because he was a poor witness. All that remains is the objective facts. On the objective facts, the accused cannot escape the conviction of murder.”

The prosecutor acknowledged at the start that he was not happy with the trial court’s factual findings.

However, he aimed to be “very cautious” not to attack the factual findings but to deal with errors in law.

He also made out a case for the validity of the appeal in light of the court making a conviction on a "competent verdict".

Read more on:    gerrie nel  |  oscar pistorius  |  barry roux  |  bloemfontein  |  pistorius trial

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.